this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
881 points (97.4% liked)

Lefty Memes

4373 readers
398 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 88 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Had this convo last night. Friend is confused as hell about what is left/right. Frustrating trying to undo years of doublethink.

The conversation wound up with this: How do you best raise a child? With one parent's word being the only thing to consider like a god? Or with the help of aunts/uncles, siblings, family, doctors, teachers, community, etc, to help them form their own opinion? Then ask yourself why is it that everyone considering themselves "conservative" spends the majority of the time screaming about how each one of those things is the enemy.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, I have a terminally racist relative and was trying to explain to her why we should look after refugees. I asked her if her neighbor's house burnt down whether she would invite them inside and offer them some shelter and comfort, and she agreed that "of course" she would. Then I asked about if it was someone from the next street over, and she immediately became hesitant about it. Sometimes I think as a species we just never psychologically evolved beyond living in a tiny village and fearing anyone we don't know personally.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 39 points 2 months ago

She saw where you were going. Or there is someone she's racist towards that lives on the next street.

But this is the best way to both keep discussions level headed and root out the real cause of the opposition. Avoid the labels and names and just talk about general ideas, see how far they will go with "hypotheticals" that don't trigger the reactions they've been embedded with. Even better, some street epistemology, often used with religion but it can be for any beliefs. The basic idea is to ask the person about their own beliefs and guide them in reasoning why they think that. It's far more complex than just that, but that's the idea, to let them come to conclusions themselves rather than some debate where their defense will come up and block any more discussion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wren@feddit.uk 56 points 2 months ago (13 children)

when talking to my parents, if I say "community" instead of "communism," or "nobody deserves to starve" instead of "free food", and "help vulnerable people" instead of "benefits" and "everyone deserves to feel safe from harm" instead of XYZ - everyone wholeheartedly agrees!

But if I let them go off on a tangent without guiding them, then they're "anti woke" even though they don't know what woke means

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Some of us Americans are so hopelessly fucking stupid. Kudos to you; I'd have blown up at them and never spoken to them again at some point.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Vebred@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also add the word 'capitalism' in there. It's like I don't even get to finish saying the word before the people I'm talking to either zones out or start defending it with: "well there is no better alternative".

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

We've tried less democracy and we're all out of ideas!

[–] huginn@feddit.it 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

... Doesn't help that it described fascism as well.

I mean that's, like, literally their name

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People really need to read Marx man…

He literally described fascism decades before it was born. He said the contradictions of capitalism would cause people to look for solutions, and a “false” path people would find was that indeed capitalism had to be overcome. But that they had to return to a pre-capitalist life, return to the land and to feudalistic idealisms. Fascist Italy literally had “guilds”…

Marx said these “anti-capitalists” would see value in communist rhetoric, because they agreed with communists half-way. But they missed that the only solution is to move forward. That before capitalism, there were contradictions that inevitably led to capitalism, and it would just happen again.

Fascism is literally miopic anti-capitalism. It’s what happens to actual justifiable dissatisfaction and anger at the system without theory and understanding.

Yes, fascism really does sound like communism. It’s the goal, it’s how it’s born. It SOUNDS like communism, but has none of the solutions or the substance.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have read Marx. I've also read Gramsci in the original Italian.

My point was just that "Fascism" comes from fascio - the binding of individual sticks together to make a stronger whole.

It's literally "Sticks together strong"

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Sure, but as others have said, that is just a basic political observation that most ideologies have made. Fascism is, as I said, entirely devoid of substance. Only the appearance of such.

“Sticks together strong” is as much a political statement as “water is wet”.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We currently live in a post scarcity world. Yes right now. The only reason we have poverty in today's world is that it financially benefits an extreme minority of humans on earth. We currently can provide for everyone and still live the same level of comfort we have now, but imaginary line on graph must go up.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

Funnily enough, even the fascists agree. The man who convinced me of that fact, and thus of socialism compared to social democracy, was Jordan "Literally a Nazi" Peterson.

In some rant of his he threw out some factoid to claim that population growth can keep expanding forever because "each new worker produces seven times more resources than they will consume in their life"

Regardless of the literal brain damage it takes to come to that conclusion from that factoid, the actual numbers aren't far off. It's a bit more complicated but the result is the same, a post scarcity society beset by parasites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Man, it's annoying what characters like Mao and Stalin (as well as America) have done to those words.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago
[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

scary socialism coming to give people a better life in general

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Evil Mao almost doubling the life expectancy and having an average growth rate of 7% for decades 😢

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

D-didn't he also destroy the agricultural system in place displacing millions of people and then destroy their cultural heritage? I might have missed a /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hell, the word "union" is such a dirty word in tech that I've literally watched people complain about employee treatment, praise employees empowering others, while saying "I'm against unions in all forms, but (lists what a union is)".

It just goes to show that branding is important. You can list something that people would 100% agree with, tell them it's the bogeyman, and they'll change their mind immediately. Call it something else, and you'll probably have work councils (unions), community support (socialism), and premium health insurance (free healthcare).

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I got some rednecks to almost agree with me about socialism at a party once.

We were outside this quaint little town that was supported almost entirely by a cement factory. People in the town had been working there for three generations. The entire town depended on the factory for its existence. If that factory closed down the town would die.

But the person who makes that decision doesn't live in the town. He doesn't even live in this country. He's just some rich dude in France who can wipe an American town off the map at a whim. Didn't we fight a revolution to stop that sort of thing? Shouldn't the people who do the work have a say in what happens?

I could see the dawning realization in their eyes just before some chud pointed out that was technically socialism and that shut down the discussion.

[–] Rawrx3@lazysoci.al 8 points 2 months ago

Not technically; explicitly. Not the garbage they've been shoveled down their throats all this time. Real change with real benefits to the workers. But I guess they don't want that for whatever reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I find it funny that it costs $30k to criminalize a homeless person, and $10k to offer supportive housing. Yet we choose the expensive option.

Same with energy we have solar, and batteries.. Yet we power cars with gasoline, we have hemp yet we make things out of plastics

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I usually just talk about worker and consumer cooperatives and if I have to name an ideology I say Mutualism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

in sweden we have the concept of "folkhemmet" (the people's home) which i like a lot for this reason, it's a big part of why sweden is such a nice place to live.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folkhemmet

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Sweden has something like 20% of housing under housing cooperatives which I like as a Mutualist who doesn't like shareholder ownership or government ownership.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 11 points 2 months ago

I think it's pretty easy to talk about the sort of political policies you want to see without feeling the need to attach political ideologies to them. You can talk about wealth redistribution all day without ever mentioning socialism.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

how do we even undo that stigma?

almost everyone i talk to who hates marxism doesnt even know what it is.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We got:

  1. Double down and fix public perception/rectify the definition

  2. Switch to a different term

  3. Avoid terms all together, focus on ideas and values

  4. Demolish any positive opinions of capitalism

Maybe there is more options, but to me #2 is probably a losing strategy, as conservatives/fascists will continue to dirty whatever new label is made, just as they've done with everything else. It'll just get us back to square 1.

A mix of #1 and #3 is probably the move. Get everybody on board with the ideas and values, while making slow progress in the background on #1.

#4 is another one that can and should always be worked on

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I hate marxism, but that's because I'm a Mutualist and agree with Proudhon's criticisms of Marx.

load more comments (1 replies)

@Flatworm7591 careful with the ape holding the fasces...

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Have you thought about using words like "unions" or "The New Deal?"

[–] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Would the apes be together if we had an anarchy? 🤔

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 months ago

Yes. You should read some basic anarchist theory, it's all about working together.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›