And folks wonder why I'm not optimistic for a Harris admin.
I can't understand how anyone could see a vote for her as anything other than harm reduction.
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10167 readers
90 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I thought you only had harm reduction as an option? It's either brain worms, nazis, losing democracy - or at least having some kind of options
On the presidential ticket for 2024, yes, harm reduction is the only option. But I don't have to like it, and it's not gonna mean that I'm not going to criticize and protest the genocide she enables.
There's more to politics than just voting in an undemocratic system.
It's a classic trolley problem. For many American voters it's a choice between their family members being murdered or more of their family members being murdered. Pull the lever to set the trolley on track to kill fewer of your family members.
The thing about the trolley problem is that it is far from unanimous how people react to being put in that position. There are many people who will not pull the lever to deliberately endorse the murder of their family members even if it means that more of their family will be killed. It is more for politicians to react to the sensibilities of their constituents than it is for constituents to conform to the desires of their politicians. It's Kamala's election to lose. Fortunately and unfortunately she's very flexible and reacts to pressure. Never let up.
Very well put.