this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

58473 readers
3951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This is one of those rare cases where what is being said is less interesting than who says it.

What: Reddit stock is junk, the IPO will fail hard, and anyone investing on it is begging to lose money. I believe that most people discussing this in Lemmy already know that, so the info isn't new here.

Who: Forbes. Forbes' target audience is investors; greedy vulture capitalists love it. So if Forbes says "it'll sink!", investors are less eager to buy stock, and that sinks the stonks even further. So what Forbes says is often a self-fulfilling prophecy.

I'm glad that Forbes is doing it. I want to see Reddit die.

EDIT: as other posters are correctly highlighting, I derped - the article is from a "contributor", and it has basically no impact or visibility.

Damn - now I want Forbes shitting on the IPO!

[–] cron@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

But you should also take into consideration that this article did not get a huge attention. It is almost a week old and has a few thousand viewers.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Their pre order ipo is wanting and planning on like $31 to $34 a share. I'm thinking no.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

$6.5B valuation (assuming a standard 20x EPS model) should imply in the neighborhood of $325M/year in revenue from a company that makes about a third of that.

Either Reddit plans on tripling its revenues in the near future or this is an unrealistic target.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

More specifically, Reddit notes in its S-1 that, as an emerging growth company, it will:

  • present only two years of audited financial statements in the S-1,
  • not be required to obtain an auditor’s attestation report on the company’s internal controls over financial reporting requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
  • provide less extensive disclosure about executive compensation arrangements, and
  • will not require stockholder non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements,

That sure sounds like a solid investment

Also, the two classes of shares (new shares get 1 vote per share, existing shareholders get 10 per share)… what the fuck. Why would anyone buy that shit

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

When I look at those numbers I think “Apollo was made by 1 dude with some occasional help from another person. Reddit is throwing half its budget and 200+ bodies at its app and site, and it’s a fucking disaster.”

[–] phcorcoran@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The comparison is even more apt when you remember that the official Reddit app also used to be the most popular and great 3rd-party app called AlienBlue, which was purchased from 1 guy and rebranded a decade ago.

It's pretty clear that the reason why the official Reddit app isn't good is because a good experience for their users isn't their goal.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

a good experience for their users isn’t their goal

They are in tension with the more pressing goal of extracting revenue. But how do you extract revenue from a site that's mostly just "user content" + "ads" in an era when ad revenue is plummeting?

Maybe if they increase the prices on Reddit Gold?

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Different goals. The goal of Apollo was to make a good app. The goal of the official reddit app is to show you ads and siphon money off you.

I guarantee you a good chunk of that R&D money is for making ads more profitable and other monetization.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, the point of Apollo was to also make money. But it was to make money by selling you things that made a nice experience nicer. Reddit makes money by selling you stuff that makes a shitty experience slightly less shitty.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I said it before on Reddit and I will say it again here—

If Reddit has asked me for a premium subscription to use my favourite third-party app, I would have fucking paid.

Just bad business all around

[–] Kinglink@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't know the right price point, but 1 dollar a month probably would have worked for most people. It just wasn't enough because they probably can make more than 1 by spoon feeding you ads now.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'd go as far as 5 dollars a month, which is more than the buck thirty they make off users right now.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It just boggles the mind.

They had the userbase. They had the community moderation. They had the power-users basically doing their job for them. They could have had a bulletproof, tied-to-world-population-growth metric - not super fast, but basically monotonically increasing. They basically could have turned it into a sustainable money printer, while not crushing user enthusiasm. Hell, they could have even done an opt- in policy for ML training datasets, either offsetting or outright paying users a commission for content that’s used as part of a training set. There were so many possibilities that didn’t involve pointing the ship at an iceberg.

Spez threw it away because he wanted the quick payout from ad revenue.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Spez threw it away because he’s a libertarian tool. He doesn’t care how he gets the payout as long as it’s not ‘collectivist’. This commie shit your’e spouting in this post would not impress daddy Elon. GTFO.

The fuck are you on about with that last half?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Return Of

It never left, bro.