The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Related
While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.
Always be civil and respectful
Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.
Don't be a bigot
No form of bigotry will be tolerated.
Don't post security compromising suggestions
If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.
Don't post conspiracy theories
Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.
Don't accuse others of shilling
Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.
Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.
The fact that they offered a way to disable this in the main settings is admirable. I understand what they're trying to do but personally I will immediately disable this.
Although do keep in mind that should this actually become a standard, you could end up in a small minority that way and hence again make yourself able to be traced by being more unique.
Of course, if you run an ad blocker it also just doesn't matter. You could set the setting to "Blurgenfurl", doesn't have any impact.
Can you explain what you mean by an adblocker making this not matter? Wouldn't that just make you more unique as well? I probably just misunderstood what you said.
Also just by using firefox you're very unique. Firefox has like 0.1% marketshare lol.
I mean if there's no ads you can possibly interact with, neither this Firefox system to anonymize ad interactions nor the websites themselves got any interactions to track in any way.
Oh true. But just having an adblocker could make you more finberprintable right? I mean literally any tweak to the browser will add to a fingerprint. But you're right. It's all a tradeoff between privacy and fingerprinting.
Fingerprinting is about privacy, and the privacy you gain through blockers far outweighs that lost by fingerprinting. So keep it up :)
That's my thinking.
[your commercially valuable web browsing history is] split into partial, indecipherable pieces and then encrypted. Each piece is addressed to a different entity — one to ISRG and one to Mozilla — so that no single entity is ever in possession of both pieces.
It seems like they've explained it more clearly this time, so there is no room for misunderstanding. We just need to trust that Mozilla and ISRG will never collude with each other to combine this data, that they'll never both be compromised by the same attacker, and that neither of them will ever have security problems that will leak the data in a way that reveals it to the other one. And our incentive to entrust all our web browsing data to this new system is that we should be happy about advertisers being able to precisely measure how well their ads are working, in the hopes that they will then be so benevolent that they decide they no longer want to scrape up all the other data they're able to collect.
Did I get that right? Because it still sounds crazy.