this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
248 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59612 readers
2975 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally I find quantum computers really impressive, and they havent been given its righteous hype.

I know they won't be something everyone has in their house but it will greatly improve some services.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Inflated Expectations. Most people who are aware of them will still talk about how they're going to destroy crypto. We are very, very far off from the size of QC that could possibly do that. It may not even be feasible to do the quantum juggling act necessary to handle that many qbits. It primarily effects public key crypto, with relatively minor effects on block ciphers and hashes. Plus, we already have post-quantum crypto making its way into TLS and other cryptographic suites.

And don't get me started on the morons who think the NSA already has some super secret breakthrough QC that can already break all crypto. Often from the same sorts of people who (correctly) throw Russell's Teapot at creationists.

Meanwhile, there are far more interesting possibilities that don't need so many qbits. Things like improving logistics or molecular simulation.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Quantum computers are now where neural nets were in the 1980s.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Good reference to compare with, but any sources?

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Davel23@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know they won't be something everyone has in their house

That's what they said about non-quantum computers 80 years ago.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 months ago

There are some things which might never be feasible no matter how much human ingenuity you throw at it, because the physics says so. FTL travel, for example.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

Domt fkrget about quantum tunneling past the activation barrier

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›