Asklemmy

43958 readers

999 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

384

My wife, newly hired, was asked to un-blur her camera during a routine meeting to confirm her I9 information. This seems like a violation to me? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by shalafi@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

125 comments fedilink hide all child comments

She had interviewed and met both remotely and in person, this guy was merely an HR drone confirming her documentation. I was a little bent when she told me he had asked her to remove her blur filter "to have a look at her working environment, make sure it's not cluttered" (something along those lines). No one else at this company requested such. Was he way out of line?

I should note, this is my PC in our living room and not where she will be working from. And this guy wants a look around our home?! Told my wife to bring this up once she's settled in, ask HR if this is policy. She started today!

She thinks it's a racism thing. I'm not so sure, but I don't have any other explanation.

(page 3) 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

EDIT: Misread the post like an idiot.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She had already met them in person and will be working in the office 3 days a week. I understand the concern, but this is not that.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I get it. I misread the post earlier. If unblurring the background was useful to uncover anyone helping her during an interview then maybe, but it's not. We do a lot of these and my clients have requirements like what I wrote before (when I misunderstood), but I have never come across someone objecting to a privacy setting like that. It's fucking weird.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Your title suggests that you're asking whether it seems like a violation to you.

Only you can answer this question.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I do thinks it a violation, or at the least, it's a strange request, especially given the context I noted.

What I'm asking is, "What's everyone else's take on this?"

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments