this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

464 readers
91 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] b34k@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Furthermore, it must prove to its client base that it can recover from the Raptor Lake fiasco by releasing power-efficient and stable processors that deliver leading performance without any self-inflicted damage during their service life.

And that’s the rub, isn’t it? Even if these new processor release with great performance gains, who out there isn’t going to have some doubt in their mind that it’s at the cost of hardware longevity?

With their poor handling of this issue, I’d probably need to wait a good 2 years to confirm that stock settings aren’t killing their processors, before I consider buying Intel again.