this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
634 points (69.2% liked)

Memes

45130 readers
1341 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NessD@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, it's not the best we have. Solar and wind are way safer, cost less and don't produce waste.

Sure, nuclear power is safe until it isn't. Fukushima and Chernobyl are examples of that. Nuclear plants in Ukraine were at risk during Russian attacks. Even if you have a modern plant, you don't really think that under capitalism there is an incentive to care properly for them in the long run. Corners will be cut.

Besides that they produce so much waste that has to be: a) being transported b) stored somewhere

Looking at the US railroad system and how it is pushed beyond it's capacity right now and seeing how nuclear waste sites are literally rotting and contaminating everything around them I'd say it's one of the least safe energies. Especially if you have clean alternatives that don't produce waste.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Aww I thought the back was going to say Steam Power.

Because that's what it is.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's pronounced nookielurr.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›