this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Ukraine

9875 readers
615 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space

Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯

πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ

πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires

See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lisko@sopuli.xyz
doo@sh.itjust.works
Burstar@sopuli.xyz
Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz
0
The NYT informs Russia about foreign aid deliveries (masto.bg)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mapto@masto.bg to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The NYT informs Russia about foreign aid deliveries

The @nytimes has published sensitive tactical details about the US arms deliveries to #Ukraine which leads to very specific risks of Russia intercepting these deliveries. Is this necessary? I don't think so.

https://www.dialog.ua/war/294421_1714936204

@ukraine

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is sensitive about these details? The NYT cutout in the link lists deliveries after they've been made, so how would they be intercepted?

[–] mapto@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Researching on time and place of arrival is a nice gift for anyone who wants to intercept these and is being cut off from doing this research themselves.

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 1 points 1 year ago

Haha, This commentary is paranoid nonsense. Intercept deliveries after they're made? Russia now has time travel? Locations named like 'Poland', 'Spain'? Oh wow, thats some serious location giveaway. If the war is going bad, don't make excuses for hypothetical security concerns which somehow got past the US govt and Pentagon from a newspaper?? If anything focus on who caused the delays for those weapons to arrive which is an actual issue, no time travel need.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yes, nyt is shit. however it's important we ask ourselves questions:

  • where did they get this info?
  • how sensitive are this info anyway? aren't they available to public?

also, i got blocked by the site. do they have the article in question in there?

[–] tearsintherain@leminal.space 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None of this is 'sensitive information'. Its not as though the nyt got some scoop about weapon deliveries and against US gov wishes printed it.

Considering that NYT is liberal, often the target of conservatives and republicans. And that it has been many conservatives and republicans who seem to practically be rooting for Putin. Conservatives and republicans who caused the delay for funding Ukraine, this whole piece seems off the mark and somewhat paranoid.