this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
156 points (93.8% liked)

Uplifting News

11001 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 178 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The moms got the court victory in case anybody else was as confused as I was with the headline and the community it was posted in lol

[–] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 69 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you for the clarification!

If you donate sperm, you ought to have no rights or responsibility to the child. That's why it's a donation

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the mistake was allowing the donor to be in the child's life. I can understand him bonding with a baby girl in that scenario. He was babysitting and watching her grow up to look and act like him. This is exactly why professional donor services keep things anonymous. I agree with you that he shouldn't have parental rights, as he gave those up as part of the donation. But I also understand how an unreasonable person reaches the conclusion that he should sue for parental rights.

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago

If the men had won this case, that would potentially open up every single other sperm donor to have to pay child support.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 weeks ago

using a friend as the donor seems like an obvious avoid to me. that said some of the news articles that have come up over the years regarding donor banks have been more than a little concerning too.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

How to Lose Friends and Alienate People 2

Electric boogaloo

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

no. 1?

How to Lose Friends and Alienate People

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago

Elle Woods had this covered lol

Unless the defendant attempted to contact every single one night stand to determine if a child resulted in those unions, he has no parental claim over this child whatsoever.

Why now? Why this sperm?

And for that matter, all masturbatory emissions where his sperm was clearly not seeking an egg, could be termed reckless abandonment.