this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
46 points (94.2% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7182 readers
469 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kinda defeats the purpose of protests eh? They're meant to be in your face so that you can't just walk by.

[–] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

Freedom to protest*

*Conditions apply.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Remind me again how did we get those free speech rules on college campuses in the first place? What was it in response to? Oh right the inability to protest the Vietnam war and the demand from students of that era and the one that followed to be allowed to protest.

Only aside from Iraq which didn't last that long to my recollection every major protest movement has been against either enemies of the US or those the US is ambivalent about like South Africa.

So this "right" has never really annoyed the powers that be until now with the pro-Palestine solidarity stuff and now they have to crush it and now all the pretensions of liberalism to caring about free speech and expression and thought are being put away and we're assured these people represent hate and must be crushed.

Seems like we never really had that right. It was a concession given then never expected to be used again and now that it has been there's outrage and the iron fist.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Good ole free speech.