this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
49 points (93.0% liked)

Games

15879 readers
859 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A 14 year old game releases at full price. God Nintendo is the worst

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

A 14 year old game releases at full price. God Nintendo is the worst

It seems to reuse the more furry player models from Tropical Freeze which is only 10 years young. ☝️🤓

[–] subignition@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But that's not full price. Full price is $70 now. :(

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Depends on if the publisher is scummy or not. BG3 and Elden Ring were $60.

Even then tho, this game was $60 back in 2010. Releasing for the same price 14 years later is insane, not even EA would pull that.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I mean, technically, it's cheaper now because of inflation, but that's more pedantic than even I care to be

but yeah, last few nintendo games have been $70 I think so there have been rumors that it's the new norm for the big N

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Last few? I just browsed the front page of the Eshop and there was only one $70 Nintendo title.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

I know totk was one, I guess I just assumed that a few more had come out at that price point

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, the inflation argument never moved me for a variety of reasons. But either way, if that’s true then the first part of my comment applies.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yup with inflation the $60 would be somewhere between $80-85 dollars equivalent in buying power.

So its technically cheaper. $60 today is $40-45, 14 years ago.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Average modern Nintendo product

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Can't wait to pirate it!

[–] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Oh fuck you Nintendo.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

People who expected anything else are delusional.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

As a Canadian, I remember when the prices were $60 for a new game...

Actually, I remember the prices going from $50 to $60.

Still seems pretty high for an HD version of a Wii game...

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

For 60 dollars I expect a Harambe skin.