this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5699 readers
3165 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Idk, man. Finland has been posting some Ls recently. The Orpo Cabinet is all about those tax cuts, business-friendly deregulations, big new military spending budgets, and tighter restrictions on immigration.

Basically doing Reaganism, Finnish style.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Of all the things you could reasonably criticize the US over, wheelchair accessibility ain't one of them. Especially compared to Europe.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's purposefully hyperbolic to illustrate a point. You think that Finland is seriously making all ice cream free?

I would not be the least bit surprised if all the Abbotts and Thomases and Trumps and Desantises (Desanti?) announced tomorrow that they would no longer be supporting the ADA's immoral drain on ~~commercial profits~~ governmental budgets.

And before someone points it out, gutting a system that he has personally benefited from to fuck over Texans is exactly the kind of thing Abbott would do.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

They would never make the fish flavored ice cream free. The economy would collapse.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

My point is that it's not a good illustration.

Just read through some of the responses I've gotten. Some people think it's a good illustration because it's very plausible. Some because it's not at all plausible.

I'm saying it's not a good illustration because it's not at all plausible.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago

Other than all the conservative efforts to destroy the ADA I guess.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think it makes much difference whether or not it is plausible. It's just trying to communicate a message. I guess it has to be plausible enough that a reader can understand what it is even talking about; but not so plausible that the reader is led to believe this specific case is actually happening.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand, disallowin wheelchair ramps because there are not mentioned in the Bible would be a very American move.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Americans are not the caricatures of evil and malice you seem to think we are.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are currently debating whether hospitals can let women die instead of performing abortions

[–] jesuiscequejesuis@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's painful to admit, but American politicians do not actually represent Americans. Over 80% of us believe abortion should be legal under some if not all circumstances. We are being held hostage by an ignorant minority.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/321143/americans-stand-abortion.aspx

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If your politicians don't represent the people, what the heck are they doing?

Or, why do your people still vote for them?

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Because the party that most people don't vote for have become exceedingly adept at gaming the system.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Then do something about it.

But your other party won't change it either, because they use the same loopholes.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

Of course we're not but "the supreme court bans something good because it's not explicitly allowed in a 200 year old document" is a goddamn accurate statement lol

[–] query@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I thought the idea was that Republicans are actively working on destroying what has been working fine and is benefitting lots of people, not just on preventing more progress.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Especially compared to Europe?

What? Europe very sound protection for the disabled. Putside of historical buildings built before disability care you won't find better access anywhere.

I get America is pretty good too, but your comment makes it sound like Europe is a nightmare for the disabled.

[–] Tvkan@feddit.de 0 points 9 months ago

Europe very sound protection for the disabled. Putside of historical buildings built before disability care you won't find better access anywhere.

But that's the point: Most buildings were built before disability care, and haven't been upgraded.* Think about your favorite restaurant, bar, kebab place, corner shop etc. – I don't think any of mine are wheelchair accessible. Also good luck taking a train in Germany, where many platforms aren't wheelchair accessible and they might or might not have a lift to get you into the train.

The Americans with Disabilites Act (ADA) is miles ahead of any legal framework that I'm aware of in Europe. The US is a broken country in many ways, but that doesn't mean that literally anything and everything has to be worse than in glorious Europe.

*The former is true for the US too, but the ADA still required many of them to make reasonable accomodations.