this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
319 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12378 readers
502 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 109 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is a good ruling. Weird title. The first judge this case was brought before said that they couldn’t claim sexual assault, only medical malpractice because they were seeking medical care when it happened.

This ruling says sexual assault is sexual assault, even in the context of a doctor’s appointment. You wouldn’t think we need to clarify that, but here we are.

Medical malpractice suits are almost never successful, so being free to get out from under that umbrella is progress. Sad that this is still only a civil case, I would want a criminal case as well. He deserves prison and not just a fine.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Thank you for the added info.

[–] VulKendov@reddthat.com 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ruling it as sexual abuse should open up a path for a criminal case as well.

Edit: he is being charged and is currently being investigated

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Welcome to the US court system

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup. The esteemed justice system that brought you the gay panic defense and affluenza, because it's too much to expect that the actual law be honored when there's a chance to exercise cruelty.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the “he’s too rich to be responsible for his own actions” defence was wild and I hate everyone involved in it almost as much as I hate the fact that it worked.

[–] medusa@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Doctors used to perform "pelvic exams" on unconscious women all the time without their knowledge or consent. Totally legit practice back in the day.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You say that as if that practice has been abandoned

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A recent survey of 101 medical students from seven American medical schools found that 92% had performed a pelvic exam on anesthetized female patients, 61% of whom reported not having explicit consent from the patients.

Double fuck

[–] Zacryon 9 points 3 months ago

Double fuck

Quite literally, isn't it?

[–] isles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I was always suspicious of male OB/GYN, it seems like an unusual specialty to choose for purely altruistic reasons.

[–] medusa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Abandoned? Definitely not. It's just not as "acceptable" these days. (Grew up with family member OB/GYN from the 1950s and was definitely the type to do that shit)

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Doogie Howser M.D. got dumped for doing exactly that.