this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
324 points (86.7% liked)

Political Memes

5506 readers
1814 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the update and fact check!

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The last edit on the Reuters article is August 11.

You can see the timestamps of the Reuters titles in OP's screenshots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It’s almost like if you’re going to report on a live, complex event in the digital age, you have to update with new information and that might change your original message.

This take is as stupid as saying someone Flipflops when they just change their opinion after learning new information

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Did israel bomb (another) school? YES / NO, youre so right, its just complex

Thats been removed from the headline, isnt that weird?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they literally flipped it and removed information from the headline. theres a limit to my gullibility.

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Without knowing where the original or updated information came from and how it was vetted I can't really form a belief or opinion. I would hope you have looked into those things though and aren't just basing your take on having read the headlines on an image otherwise that limit to your gullibility that you were talking about is quite high.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I do wonder if this is due to automated A/B testing, similar to how you can upload multiple thumbnails on YouTube, and the algorithm will automatically choose the one that provides the most traction.

If the sole purpose is to generate as many clicks as possible, that kinda tracks.

[–] ShadowZone@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

With normal news websites, A/B testing could be a thing. We had a rudimentary implementation of that back in 2011 already. But this is Reuters, a news agency. They are B2B and don't care about clicks, their business model is selling first hand reporting to other media outlets (e.g. CNN, USA Today etc). As stories develop, so does the title. Especially when ongoing conflicts are concerned.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 8 points 3 months ago

It clearly states it was edited

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait what the fuck that's a thing?? Is that why certain videos seem to change their name weeks later?

[–] And009@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's done manually on youtube but website like these likely have that feature built in

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I thought it used to be done manually, but now there's automation built in to YouTube, I recall hearing. It might only be available to certain users, though.

I think I recall it being discussed in relation to Veritasium, although I can't recall if it was a third party mentioning it or Derek (Veritasium) himself.

I haven't heard of it built into news websites before, but it also wouldn't surprise me if that already was a thing.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, they have automated a/b testing for thumbnails and titles IIRC.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

CSI had ENHANCE, media have ADJUST

[–] MediaSensationalism@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not always the case, but I've found that some outlets like to write their first article title completely false so that a more alarming headline is distributed that way to subscriber notifications and RSS, then they update it on their own a few hours later after the false headline has already been shared and posted across the web so they can plead an honest mistake if necessary.

I appreciate that The Guardian is mentioned here because they're one of the worst offenders I've noticed.

load more comments
view more: next ›