this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
105 points (99.1% liked)

Ukraine

8044 readers
534 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Just look at some of the vehicles that aren't burt out. Some of them look more or less fine at first glance. Notice that all their tires are flat.

I remember seeing a video filmed by a Russian who's vehicle had been hit by a HIMARS strike, and he showed how the vehicle looked fine at a distance, but up close you could see that the whole thing was perforated by tiny holes. These little holes were made by thousands of small tungsten balls moving fast enough to pierce clean through the engine block.

It appears that all those flat tires are indicating that those entire trucks, and anyone who was on them, are similarly perforated.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Or, hear me out, ALL Russian vehicles have flat tires by default.

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Was it this one?
https://t.me/liveukraine_media/12694

edit:
More tungsten holes
https://t.me/combatfootageua/13428

Fired from a Leopard
https://t.me/combatfootageua/12291

GMLRS Alternative Warhead Engineer & Manufacturing Development Phase Test & Evaluation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5h7BkCj5rI

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The secret of the M30A1 lies in a huge number of tungsten BBs arranged around an explosive core – about 182,000 of them. The design is from a technology known as Lethality Enhanced Ordnance developed by Orbital ATK, later acquired by Northrop Grumman. This approach uses computer modeling to calculate the optimum size, number, density and placement of fragments to ensure that a warhead produces the maximum possible effect against a specific type of target. The developers claim that the M30A1 produces the same sort of lethality as the cluster warhead. This blanketed an area of over four football fields per rocket, so a salvo of six would blanket half a square mile.

Imagine riding along, you're suddenly on the floor somehow and everyone is dead or dying around you.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

As much as I don't like such advanced weapons capable of killing hundreds or thousands in a single blow, they are used in the "appropriate" way and are so much better than cluster munitions that leave behind deadly unexploded granades

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 7 points 1 month ago

Jesus wept. I've always had a morbid fascination with weapons and this one definitely "satisfies" the morbid part. I agree with the other person. This is better than cluster munitions since it will result in far fewer civilian casualties, but it's also tremendously fucked. It makes me feel about as icky as thermobaric bombs do.

I hate to think what the improvement to this idea will look like. I'm sure it will be improved upon, since Northrop now has plenty of field data showing the effectiveness of this design.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

We really put a lot of time and effort to find the best ways to kill each other.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thats the one! I had forgotten how you could see all the punctures in the windshields. But when not a single tire survives, it indicates a very high density of shrapnel. I saw someone else commenting here that this could have been a Bradley, and while a Bradley could probably also have decimated an unarmoured column like this one, I don't think we would be seeing this kind of damage if that was the case.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I only saw all the corpses inside those seemingly intact vehicles, didn't even notice the tires.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The corpses could in principle have been placed there after the strike, or could have been killed by machine gun fire to the back of the truck. To me, what makes HIMARS the likely culprit here is the tires.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Probably, I agree with your reasoning. I was just dumbfounded by the massacre and my first thought was that they had been collecting corpses in the trucks, but after a few trucks like that, that made no sense anymore. Then you provided the probable answer in the comments.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ooof. Those trucks full of 200's

[–] LaFinlandia@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is likely the deadliest strike on Russian forces since the beginning of Russia's invasion.

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 11 points 1 month ago

Probably since they himarsed that new conscript party.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I'm thinking of the 2023 new years strike

[–] RandomStickman@kbin.run 13 points 1 month ago

All the civilians driving around trying to get on with their day swerving around brunt up trucks full of dead bodies. I can't imagine living in a warzone.

[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

what is he saying?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This could have been done by a single Bradley or similar. Getting caught with their pants down seems to be standard procedure for the Russians.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Too much area