this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
118 points (97.6% liked)

News

23622 readers
2870 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The SLAPP seems to working as intended.

An advertising industry initiative targeted by an Elon Musk lawsuit is "discontinuing" its activities and has deleted the member list from its website.

Stephan Loerke, the CEO of the WFA, wrote in an email to members, seen by Business Insider, that the decision was "not made lightly" but that GARM is a not-for-profit organization with limited resources.

Today, the House Judiciary GOP's official account on X called GARM being discontinued a "big win for the First Amendment" and a "big win for oversight." X CEO Linda Yaccarino also applauded the news.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Can someone explain like I’m dumb? This sounds bad, because a non profit is being bullied into shutting down because of a lawsuit, but it’s also being hailed as a first amendment win, which sounds like the opposite of what is happening.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Republicans call it a first amendment win because GARM would tell advertisers when their ads are running on platforms along side dangerous or illegal content. And they equate being given carte blanche to spread any and all harmful content on social media with free speech.

[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Gotcha thank you. So standard Gaslight Obstruct Project going on.

[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just so I got this clear, making it illegal to tell advertisers when their ads are running next to dangerous or illegal content is a freedom of speech win?

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yes and it's pretty obvious how. I'm just waiting for my overlords to tell me exactly why it's obvious.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) is a cross-industry initiative established in 2019 by the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) to help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetization via advertising. https://wfanet.org/leadership/garm/about-garm

[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So it shutting down because of this lawsuit is a bad thing. I wonder if the advertising industry will come up with anything to replace it.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Brother if Elon Musk is for it you can go ahead and assume it's bad.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If there is ever a blindingly obvious moral and utilitarian imperative to stand up for what's right, you can count on the advertising industry to do the opposite

e;

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

with any luck it will result in more companies pulling advertising from the platform and then pulling from all companies ever tied to Musk. He has proven to be poison to what he comes into contact with.

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I won't shed a tear for the advertising industry

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, it’s the ad industry. But this was a non profit that alerted advertisers when their ads were being pushed by/alongside hate content. So not like an advertising agency shutting down, but an initiative to stop supporting hate with advertising. So not a win for anyone but hate groups and those who want to support/promote them.

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

I think there's a bit more to it than that.

It's very unfortunate that this came as a result of a baseless tantrum from Elon. And his arguments are contrary to free speech.

That said... GARM is actually bad, and the world is a better place without it in my opinion. They are frequently involved in censoring legitimate journalism of violent events, anything that's inappropriate from children, etc. You know how so many YouTubers have to carefully tiptoe around mention of controversial topics, even in non-controversial contexts, for fear of getting demonetized? I understand the POV of avoiding advertising near hate, but the fallout has real consequences when legitimate content is inevitably caught up.

https://www.techdirt.com/2024/08/09/jim-jordan-celebrates-successful-speech-suppression-as-a-claimed-win-for-free-speech/

Another way to see it is that GARM is simply a trade organization by advertisers for advertisers, with one single goal: to maximize profits for the advertising industry. No corporation actually cares about ethics; it's just that appearing to be ethical is often profitable, and in this case, advertisers believe that avoiding advertising near controversial content is better for their bottom line. If one believes that advertising is one of the most abusive industries in our modern society, it could be seen that anything to make it a little harder for advertisers to extract more profits is a win.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

This seems like a BFD

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago

Ars Technica - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Ars Technica:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/ad-industry-initiative-abruptly-shuts-down-after-lawsuit-filed-by-elon-musks-x/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support