Pulse of Truth

525 readers

244 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

krogoth@infosec.pub

A look at AI age scanners, which websites use to verify a person's age by analyzing their facial patterns via webcam to help safeguard kids online (Drew Harwell/Washington Post) (www.techmeme.com)

submitted 3 months ago by lemmydev2@infosec.pub to c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Drew Harwell / Washington Post: A look at AI age scanners, which websites use to verify a person's age by analyzing their facial patterns via webcam to help safeguard kids online — “Age assurance” checks are increasingly popular among lawmakers trying to wall kids off from the open internet.

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

I'd be shocked that parents would allow a company to video record their children. I just see this as biometric data harvesting in its infancy.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

Haha, no. There's not a single website or service I'd accept being forced to show my face to AI that I would continue to use. If Steam required that, I would delete it from my computer.

They can fuck all the way off with that. Maybe parents should try parenting...?

[–] EmperorHenry@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"give us the key you use to get into many of your devices and we'll let you use our service!"

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you're using your face to log in to things, you're not concerned about security.

[–] EmperorHenry@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't, but many people do use their faces to unlock things

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah sorry didn't mean you in particular

[–] EmperorHenry@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago

no offense taken.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Great idea. Nothing could possibly go wrong.