this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
18 points (82.1% liked)

Games

16651 readers
907 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think this is just an excuse to delay it. I don't think there's that many big releases coming up this year.

[–] MarcomachtKuchen 3 points 3 months ago

Which would have been fine without the excuse. Just tell me the game is not ready yet and I'm happy with every delay, that makes it a better game

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hate everything about this logic. I can sort of understand multiplayer stuff needing momentum, though that's usually nonsense too, but acknowledging it and saying you're scared to "compete" with completely different games is corny as hell.

Just make a good game and release it when it's ready. If it's actually good, people are going to figure it out.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If they release two games at once then those games compete with each other for sales. Some people may purchase one but feel disinclined to purchase the other regardless of its quality because they can't afford both or think the purchases are too close to each other.

This is what has created "hidden gems" in the past, one game completely overshadowing everything else, despite some of the other games possibly being better.

That's why publishers try to release certain games around some games but not others. The same thing happens with movies. Disney's Treasure Planet is a good example. Its a movie that would typically release in the Summer, which Disney released in the Winter and in theatres where it competed with another Disney film, The Santa Claus 2. Treasure Planet went on to be known as one of the biggest animated box office flops ever, losing Disney an estimated $109 million.

Publishers want to avoid that.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 months ago

It's literally only relevant because their business model is to try to trick people into buying trash.

This is so dumb. Most people are not going to play all of these games. They will likely only play one to three of them all together. Pushing the release date back solely based on the misguided assumption that gamers buy every game released is absolutely frustrating. I only see two of these I'll even consider buying and only after I read reviews from actual players and not paid reviews. 😒

[–] Tolstoy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 3 months ago

There are add-ons that let you play as a decent DPS with an Xbox controller on PC. It's not beyond possibility.