United Kingdom

4081 readers

62 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

Royal Mail deal to be probed over potential Russia links (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 3 months ago by Mex@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

Having a monarchy is stupid, but not as stupid as selling the Royal Mail to foreign billionaires.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nationalize it.

On another topic:

He also said he is "very open" to profit sharing, but he is not in favour of the shared ownership the union are pushing for.

"I don't think the ownership stake is the right model," he said. "The logic is: share of profit, yes, [but an] ownership structure creates a lot of complexity.

"For instance, what happens if the employee leaves? He has shares, he is leaving, he is not working for the company, he [still] needs remunerating."

How is "he [still] needs remunerating" a valid objection to employees owning a share in the company?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 3 months ago

I don't think he understands how shares work. If I hold shares in a company it doesn't matter if I work for the company or not.

I've actually worked at places where part of the remuneration was as shares in the company. Startups. I left I wasn't required to give the shares back that would make no sense.