Why is this move of Max more severe than Alonso and Sainz crashing into other cars at turn 1? Were there even penalties for them?
Edit: am I totally fine with this penalty... But why didn't the others get one?
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
Formula 1
9048 readers
63 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| πΊπΈ United States | 21-23 Nov |
| πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
not more severe, he just gained an advantage from it whereas Alonso and Sainz both fell to the back. I'm guessing if he gave the place back none of this would have happened.
Penalties are not dished out by the severity of the outcome though. They are given for the severity of the offense committed.
They aren't not applied by severity of outcome in the sense that you don't get a harsher penalty if you take out the race leader vs a backmarker, but it does absolutely make a difference if you gained an advantage from the situation.
I don't believe it! They normally let him get off Scot free. This penalty will have zero impact on him though because he's already won and a 5 second penalty when you have the fastest car on the track is a joke
The 5 seconds could have impacted is race, but he got lucky with the SC. Leclerc had a realistic chance to win after the first round of pitstops.