this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19617 readers
364 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beardsley@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (12 children)

I'll fight anyone who says 1998 is retro. I'm getting old, but give me a few more years damn.

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Bro, 2010 is retro now

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Those few years between 1992-1998 were as .. game-changing .. for games as probably the two decades that followed. We started it with side scrollers, Dune and Doom and ended it with Diablo II, StarCraft and Half-Life.

For the kids here who haven't experienced Half-Life, you should play Black Mesa. For the retro farts who have played Half-Life, you should also play Black Mesa. It's the Half-Life you couldn't have in 1998 because of the slow hardware. I weeped from feels playing it.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Old fart here. I played Wolfenstein 3d, then played the shit out of Doom and Duke Nukem 3d but missed out on Half life until recently. Knowing the context of the era it came out in, I can totally see how amazing it must have been. Hell, it's still incredibly fun for me in this era.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Blizzard used to give me such warm fuzzies.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Now they just price gouge you, and sexuality harass the employees.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I spent sooooooooo much time on StarCraft and Diablo II. First video game I remember playing was Wolfenstein 3D, then Duke Nukem. Found RTS soon after.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

I remember upgrading my PC from 4MB to 8MB, just to be able to play Duke3D, cost me a pretty penny as well

[–] scops@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

Bro, we lost that fight. I was watching a Youtube video of a guy clearing games from his Steam backlog and introduced one with, "So, many of you watching probably weren't alive when this game came out. Everyone talks about what a classic this is, but I don't think I've met anyone who has actually played this game."

I died a little inside when it turned out he was talking about the first Half-Life.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

If in 1998 you would have argued that 1972 is retro, then I'm sorry to tell you that 1998 is retro

[–] M137@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I understand saying you don't feel like 2010 is retro, but 1998? That's been retro for a long time. You're in a really extreme place in your head when you stick to not calling something that's 25 years old retro.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

You mean the late 1900's

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nerdybynature@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Honestly, might be nostalgic for guys, but as a girl who was playing games in this era, it made me feel like I wasn’t a part of the culture, rarely if ever were there ads marketed towards me, but man were there a lot of half naked ladies. Glad we don’t do this as much, but god this caused a lot of younger girls to feel ashamed of playing games “for boys”.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It really sucks looking at the detrimental effect this had on gender ratios in gaming to this day. It's gotten a lot better but it's still not there yet.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Yeah, we need to level the playing field by having half naked sexy guys on the cover of games. ^please

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Like Fabio? Pretty much any depiction of a barbarian is some muscular dude wearing only a loincloth and his broadsword.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Doubt that's going to be enough, I think if you want to make a sexually objectifying 90s magazine ad that appeals to female nerds you're going to have to break out the homoerotic innuendos

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

People used to bring up Kratos in these discussions but before these new games he seemed far more likely to bite someone's face off than to kiss anyone. There's a difference.

[–] molochthagod@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd rather we stop sexualizing characters altogether. If anything, it's silly and makes it more difficult to take them seriously.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I think there is space for both sexualized and non-sexualized characters, as long as they are treated evenly. This is entertainment, they don't need to be all business serious.

I dread that in trying to be perfectly respectable, the medium might err to the side of prudishness and sexual repression.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

looking in your direction, clive rosfield

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago

I'm ok with that

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

It's not really nostalgic for me, TBH. It's actually kind of embarrassing that marketing like this existed and that it worked. I love T&A as much as the next female-loving guy, but ads like this are condescending. But again, they sold units...

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

There were lots of half-naked men, too. Including in this ad.

Most of them in games were more male fantasy stuff...ripped, shirtless dudes with big weapons. Not really appealing to most women, but checks the "I want to BE him" aspect for lots of guys, lol

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, but that is just another facet of marketing for men. Sexy dress-up vs tighty whities. Definitely not intended to get women interested.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I can imagine. I'm glad this is less prevalent now. Seeing it now in middle age makes me go ick. I wished I had been much more aware of this kind of sexism as a boy.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I was a senior in high school at the time and even back then I thought this kind of advertising was crass, gross, and unnecessary. No nostalgia here, just second-hand embarrassment.

[–] molochthagod@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The weird thing is, as a guy, I never even paid attention to the sexualized stuff in games. To me these are like two different brain activities. So, as far as I'm concerned, there was never any point in this kind of marketing. I've never in my life purchased a game because it featured sexy ladies.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

It's supposed to be subconscious, like with most marketing. It hits the animal part of the brain, rather than the thinking part.

[–] ShustOne@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah as a boy I didn't like these either. They were sexy but made me feel a little weird. I was young enough not to realize it was targeting only boys, but now that I'm older I think that's why I didn't like them. I wasn't in to sex at the time.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah. Even just around a decade ago I'd explain the demographics shift to more women gamers to clients and they'd not believe it.

Stereotypes stick around for a long time, even when (or maybe especially when) untrue.

It's a shame that "girl gamers" were considered such a rarity when it really seemed like a self-fulfilling prophecy.

"Oh, a game with only male protagonists with activities only primarily associated with boys doesn't have many girls playing it? I guess girls aren't that into games and we should double down on the focus on dudes."

As a result, the market effectively abandoned around half of two generations of a potential continued audience and had a significantly reduced pool of interested labor to make games.

It's a bit frustrating given my love for games that they could likely have advanced even further had it not been an exclusionary industry for as long as it was (though that can be said about pretty much every business vertical in existence too given our generalized collective history of exclusion).

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

but why is he wearing a diaper?

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's not an ad. That's just some cosplayer showing off her muff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Media today might be less sexist but I think part of it is also that it became drastically more sex averse. Mortal Kombat is gorier than ever for anyone to see, but god forbid anything shows a nipple.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Yep, those were different times.

Battlecruiser 3000AD. This advert was later revised and they drew black knickers on the model.

Psycho Pigs UXB. Another British classic?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›