this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
104 points (98.1% liked)

birding

3610 readers
113 users here now

A community for people who like birds, birdwatching and birding in general!

Feel free to share your photos and other birding-related content here. If a photo you post isn't yours, please credit the original creator! Additionally, it would be appreciated if the location of the sighting and a date were given when a photo or question is posted. You do not have to give the precise location, something like "Northern Idaho, June 2023" or even "North-Western US, June 2023" suffices.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] javasux@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿ‘„๐Ÿ‘๏ธ

[โ€“] moistclump@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The beak looks likes a little dogs face on its own.

[โ€“] DonPiano 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, anatidae always have a little bonus subject in their bills, I like it

[โ€“] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Looks like a machine gun

-- Sonia Sotomayor

[โ€“] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Out of interest, is the green under its chin a result of trying to get light/histogram levels correct, or was it really "there". I often have trouble with over-exposed areas picking up a green or blue tinge when corrected.

[โ€“] DonPiano 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's actually really there in the sense that the grass the goose is standing on is very green and reflected off their chin! :)

I wondered the same for a second when I went through the pictures at home.

[โ€“] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. What's worse, is that I lost quite a few attempts to this problem today: white gulls and the like, against dark backgrounds. Trying to remove over-exposure just leaves a vivid green discolouration,

[โ€“] DonPiano 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Huh, interesting. I wonder where the difference is coming from. You use a Canon, right? Maybe that plays a role? But surely that would be more an issue of raw data interpretation.. Do you have any examples easily on hand?

I don't think it'd be an issue of sea birds, would it? Blue seas would tint things blue and, if (over-)corrected, orange, I'd assume..

[โ€“] DonPiano 1 points 5 months ago

Oh, right: I'm using a nikon z6ii with a sigma 150-500 mm lens.

[โ€“] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It is indeed a Canon, and using Canon's DPP4 to correct the over-exposed whites using the RAW format of pictures. I really ought to research it properly, but I'm guessing that different colours (YGB) are reaching over-exposed to different degrees and getting capped. E.g. Blue is very over-exposed, Yellow is a bit over-exposed and Green is only barely over-exposed. Then when I try to bring them back to properly exposed "as one" with the histogram tool or brigtness slider, those caps and degrees are getting messed up, giving a colour balance in a manner that doesn't reflect the original and I get a green tinge.

That, or pay more attention to whites in frame!

[โ€“] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Slow zoom, dial tone.