this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

science

14348 readers
112 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's the part where they explain the theoretical solution

Under Oppenheim's theory, however, space-time wouldn't just be smooth, it would become sort of wobbly and unpredictable.

Here's where it becomes testable. This wobbliness would result in fluctuations of measurable properties that are larger than the fluctuations predicted by quantum theory.

With the right experiment, physicists could look for those fluctuations.

We have shown that if space-time doesn't have a quantum nature, then there must be random fluctuations in the curvature of space-time which have a particular signature that can be verified experimentally," says physicist Zach Weller-Davies of University College London.

"In both quantum gravity and classical gravity, space-time must be undergoing violent and random fluctuations all around us, but on a scale which we haven't yet been able to detect. But if space-time is classical, the fluctuations have to be larger than a certain scale, and this scale can be determined by another experiment where we test how long we can put a heavy atom in superposition of being in two different locations."

I think they don't really do a good job of explaining it, so if anyone here knows more about it, please share!

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So basically they're hoping that space doesnt act like literally everything else and hoping that avoiding having to reconcile the two (quantum physics and gravity) in the first place solves the problem.

Tbh I think this is a model based on optimism not what we observe.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On cooler news. We found out that our previous measurements on the acceleration of the universes expansion might have been entirely wrong

That is because the data could have been skewed by a rather recently discovered superstructure called the "Local Void" which the milky way galaxy itself borders to and has been obscured by our own galaxy. It's very likely that the universe might not be expanding at an increasing speed after all of it turns out the "local void" skewed the data we have. We are in the middle of figuring THAT out!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can the universe even expand faster than the "speed of light"? Not saying anyone is claiming that, just a thought I had.

[–] int3ro@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Cool. I was hoping that would be the answer, so that I could ask, How do we know?

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 0 points 9 months ago

We need a time period of inflation to explain our very homogeneous universe. Just read up on the wiki page about the inflationary epoch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)