this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Games

16651 readers
841 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dear Kotaku (and other news outlets): can you please stop referring to people getting fired as "being made redundant"?

The term doesn't even work. The people getting axed are very obviously not redundant if axing them likely leads to the cancellation of a project.

[–] adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In UK nomenclature being made redundant, rounds of redundancies, and layoffs are used interchangeably. A percentage of the workforce loses their job because of circumstances outside their control.

To be fired/sacked though, that very specifically means you did bad; you failed to do your job.

It's probably similar in Australia?

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Tbf, I didn't see the .au in the URL.

Good point on the distinction between layoff and firing though. Although I still dislike "redundant" as a synonym for the former.