this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58937 readers
3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] june@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if my mom will accept this vaccine for her cancer after years of believing all the conspiracy theories about the COVID vaccine. I’m willing to bet that if she has the opportunity, she’ll jump on it.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

You are somewhat comparing apples with oranges. Administering vaccines against slow acting illnesses to the sick is different to preventive vaccination. Both are sensible.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The vaccine works by instructing the body to make up to 34 “neoantigens.” These are proteins found only on the cancer cells, and Moderna personalizes the vaccine for each recipient so that it carries instructions for the neoantigens on their cancer cells.

That’s pretty dope

[–] WidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You mispelled "expensive."

[–] CarrotBottom@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It'll be reasonably expensive, but sequencing and gene alteration is way cheaper than in needs to be.

If this can actually cure cancers, it may even be worth it.

The thing is, surely there's antibody against cancer antigens anyway, in ordinary cancer. A cancer cell expresses epitopes not on healthy cells.

Why is this better?

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but sequencing and gene alteration is way cheaper than in[sic] needs to be.

...what? this sounds like you're advocating for price increases.

[–] CarrotBottom@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oops, new to Lemmy. But not new to typing, so no excuse.

I meant than "it used to be".

I blame autocorrect.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

There's an edit button