The most efficient and sustainable battery is none at all, in some cases this is not possible, but for trains the alternative is literally older than sliced bread.
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)
Europe
8488 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, π©πͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Makes me wonder if this is cheaper than refitting a train line with overhead wiring and if not possible, power rails.
Almost certainly not, expanding 2.5 miles of additional catenary or especially third rail really isnβt going to have that much of a cost compared to specialized rolling stock. Itβs also worth noting that the longer the route the less practical it is just down to the scale of battery needed and time it wastes charging.
Well, trials are there for a reason. Battery-only-powered trains could be a good idea or a bad idea.
Remember the trial project for overhead wiring for trucks on the motorway? It ran for a couple of years, and the end result was that it wasn't feasible, despite some interesting benefits. But if it weren't for the trial, some people would still think it was feasible, while others would think it was unfeasible.
I'm leaning more on the unfeasible side with this train, but let's just see what happens.
The article covered that. This is designed to be cheaper apparently....
Thanks, glimpsed over that line too fast. So durability concerns are most likely the limiting factor, hence the trial run. If, say, the battery can't keep up wih continuously getting topped up and fails after a short time, it's impractical/expensive. But could be the other way around as well.