this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

United Kingdom

4069 readers
131 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear accidents. Something to look forward to in the future in the way the water companies dump sewage into the waterways whenever it rains.

Investment needs to be 100% green. Not nuclear.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's currently no green alternative to baseload power.

Wind is great when it blows, solar is great when it's not night, hydro is great when you need a quick boost to cope with people turning the kettle on at half-time.

Not investing in nuclear faster has arguably been a disaster for the environment. Whilst it has the risks that come with nuclear reactors, it has an extremely low carbon footprint. The amount of CO2 that has been produced due to our reliance on fossil fuels that could have been prevented with nuclear power is absolutely huge.

"Environmentalists" that oppose nuclear power are shooting themselves in the foot.

[–] barttier@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Storage. It is possible. Cheaper and safer. Safe potential, and chemical energy. It is even more realistic with current and future power grids.

Solar and wind energy never needed terms like nuclear semiotics. Safe technologies don't need those terms.