Despite the somewhat confusing title, this is an analysis of the merger trial, and how it could continue. Definitely worth the read, it pulls back the curtain on what happens when two giant corporations are trying to fuse.

"The idea is to create a moat that nobody else can attack." - Microsoft exec Matt Booty

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] LostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read this last night and thought it was a good article. I'm surprised by the lack of comments.

[–] Lazylore@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably in part that it's irrelevant to most console and PC gamers. People are probably hoping to see some good old IP's brought back to life instead of laying between Bobby's cheeks and rot, and the only chance they are seeing is if Activision isn't in control of them anymore.

Activision Blizzard is a mobile company, out earning PC and consoles combined. Blizzard is a shell of its former self, and Activision don't know how to make anything but CoD, remake and a rare Crash game.

TLDR: Most people don't care too much about this merger, and let's be honest, the Zenimax one was more relevant to most people here.

[–] HaiZhung@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t call it irrelevant. In my opinion it’s almost a given that long term, this is a bad deal for consumers. If you like video games, you should be rooting for competition, not consolidation.

Microsoft has in the past and will in the future abuse monopoly powers, if one lets them.