this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

45637 readers
1160 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of an app I downloaded the other day to help plan routes. They asked for my cars "KPL".

Like what? Who in the world says KPL? It's l/100KM.

While I'm aware that some places may use KPL, it just seems very American to go "hey, we use MPG, so they must use KPL".

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I grew up with km/L.

I don't mind using whatever scale, but it's somewhat better for comparing the numbers that cars actually use, because with l/100km every car is five something or six something.

Also the higher numbers are better like everything else on the car comparison cards.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah maybe it’s just being an American but mpg makes sense in an intuitive way, so kpl sounds like it would be rightish. I’d never guess that people would use l/100km, and I use metric somewhat regularly in my personal life

[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Guess the difference is what you grew up with and therefore intuitively prefer:

  • allegedly american thinking: This baby sucks X gallons. Let's see how far I can get with it

  • allegedly non-american thanking: I need to drive roughly X 1/2 hundred kilometers, and that will burn that much fuel.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’d change the American thinking from that to bigger number goes further for same fuel/how many miles til I refuel.

[–] onion@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the non american to bigger number=bigger fuel consumption

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s fair, though there was a non American agreeing that every other number is bigger is better so it’s nice when all numbers are that way.

That said all this is soon to be irrelevant. We’ll all be using wh/m soon enough

[–] onion@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Why not mpwh?

[–] KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km lol

My best vehicle is 10. My worst is 28. Unless you're a hybrid, I don't know of a single vehicle doing 5-6l/100km

[–] Knuschberkeks@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

what? Even my parents 6 Seater family car drank only 8l back in the day, I drive my Opel Astra with about 7 and my brothers little fiat drinks 4,5 if he drives efficiently. You gotts have either s pickup truck or something really old.

[–] KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What? A pickup uses 15-28 l/100km.

A Silverado uses 15MPG, according to GM themselves. That's like 16l/100km

[–] onion@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A Polo 3-cylinder runs at around 5.5l/100km mixed city/interstate. 16l is atrocius

[–] KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I've never seen a 3 cylinder vehicle in my life lol.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Remember The Ford Fiesta, or was it the Firefly?? Iforget the name but that was a 3 cylinder.

[–] onion@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Still is. Focus, C-Max, B-Max, Fiesta, EcoSport, Mondeo, Transit and Puma are the models listed on Wikipedia available with a three cylinder

[–] onion@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You propably did but never noticed.

It's a 1l 75hp engine, topping out at 175km/h or 108mph. Perfect for a commuter car

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight-three_engine