this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
73 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3611 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zwuzelmaus 24 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

investors in OpenAI’s commercial entity were capped at making 100 times their money

They should never be allowed to call this a "non-profit" (and probably even get tax exemptions?)

What a dirty lie in the first place!

[–] A_norny_mousse 1 points 9 minutes ago

Oh, thanks for pointing that out.... my head was just going "Fuck Sam Altman .. Fuck Sam Altman .. Fuck Sam Altman .. Fuck Sam Altman .. Fuck Sam Altman ...." ---

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 35 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

“Previously, investors in OpenAI’s commercial entity were capped at making 100 times their money before the rest of its profits flowed back to the nonprofit.

With the new PBC subsidiary, OpenAI spokesperson Steve Sharpe tells me that investors and employees will own regular stock with no cap on how much it can appreciate. “

They got exactly what they want anyway. This is no victory.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

This doesn't make sense to me. The ultimate value of shares is in the dividends they represent, no? If there are no dividends ever, what are they sharing in? Is it just a postponement until future dividends? A share in control of activities?

I get that there'll be speculation that will keep values increasing, and selling can net a profit, but what does the last share-holder get?

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Technology and intellectual property, including patents. These are only put up for sale if the company is liquidated or declared bankrupt.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

what does the last shareholder get?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory

Once the bubble pops they’ll rugpull the same way they do crypto. Either that or it will grow so large that they convince someone to aquire them wholesale

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 0 points 1 hour ago

This is just every economic endeavour in existence nowadays, the issue with cryptocurrency is that it contains no guard rails (+ environmental issues)

Unless you work for a corporation, ask your employer what their exit strategy is.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

"we can make enough money without it"

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago

Great news.