Love for Putin would be one. As long as Die Linke is keeping Wagenknecht, they have to endure comparisons like that. And I say that as someone who voted for them the last election.

[Context: Wagenknecht is a prominent politician of The Left party]

While I could give examples, this piece of satire should contain more than enough context.

Said women in that article is also very concerned about the trans lobby, which is totally not a right-wing boogeyman.

Let's play a game, shall we? Here's a few quotes and you should guess whether it's made by a fascist or by Wagenknecht. In each topic one is made by her, the other by the fascists:

Identity politics:

Identity politics amounts to focusing attention on ever smaller and ever more bizarre minorities, each of which finds its identity in some quirk by which it differs from the majority society and from which it derives the claim of being a victim.

The case of the job advertisement of a student anti-discrimination office in Berlin, which asks white people not to apply, shows the whole madness of left-wing identity politics.

The Green party and their politics:

Today, prosperity and nature are massively endangered by a Green policy to which all established parties have indiscriminately subscribed.

The Greens are damaging our industry and the prosperity of millions with their so-called climate policy, which does nothing for the climate.

On climate gluers protesting climate change:

And even more so, I reject the presumption of wanting to parent people. The climate gluers probably really believe that the world will end tomorrow if Germany does not save it by radically renouncing prosperity.

Due to increased prices and the threat of insolvencies, many employees are already on the edge of their existence anyway. Many simply cannot afford to be prevented from arriving at work on time by privileged full-time activists.

A revision to the 1980s "transsexual law", lowering the hurdles to change your gender.

The ideological background of the law is precisely to deny gender as a biological fact and to make it a matter of state of mind.

Ignoring cautionary voices, for example, that such a law would encourage criminal concealment of identity, the federal government is once again not only elevating itself above scientific facts, but is once again going against the Basic Law.

Immigration:

Mrs. Merkel's decision in 2015 opened the way to Germany mainly for young men. Real help would instead focus primarily on women, children, the elderly, the weak and the poorest. But they can't pay traffickers and can't survive a long flight.

The asylum seekers and illegal immigrants who flocked to Germany in even greater numbers because of Merkel's invitation have also been disappointed: To this day, the vast majority have no jobs. Instead, they are a massive burden on our social systems.

The right is to travel, not to "walk". Your power to limit my freedom of movement is strictly limited under Article 29: you can only do so by enacting law. Without a specific law creating the limitation (such as "don't drive on a sidewalk") you may not arbitrarily decide what modes and methods of travel are acceptable, nor what modes and methods may be infringed upon.

Further, your arbitrary assumption that I am capable of walking specifically violates Article 2, Article 7, and Article 25. Your insinuation that I am only entitled to travel within a reasonable "walking" distance violates one or more of Articles 23 through 27.