What an incredibly infuriating waste of effort that would be so much better spent on trains, driverless or otherwise.
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
320 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
69702 readers
3439 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I disagree. There are many situations where a truck is better suited for transport than a train. The US already has a pretty large freight train network. I agree that there definitely should be more investment in rail as well, but there's no reason for both not to exist at the same time.
There are, but “long haul routes” are definitely better for a train.
I don't know why you're being down voted; here's an upvote for being sensible.
Fuck cars. Fuck massive death trucks even more.
And how do they handle a person slowing down in front of them and hijacking them? At least a human might be able to navigate away aggressively but I think the programming would prevent as much harm as possible.
This new lawless future and we may need to raid corpo lords.
I can't really imagine people wanting to hijack a truck that's basically a giant camera and tracking system.
I've seen plenty of youtube videos to know people are dumb enough to try this.
The resistance needs supplies!
load more comments
(6 replies)
I think the programming would prevent as much harm as possible.
well, yeah... why wouldn't you want a human to do the same thing??? you're watching too many fast and furious movies.
Firstly, no one in an 18 wheeler loaded with cargo is "navigating away" from anyone desperate enough to attempt such a scheme. This entire idea is ludicrous, think about how slow and massive those trucks are.
Secondly, you don't want an 18 wheeler loaded with cargo being driven aggressively. You're just escalating the risk of killing yourself and everyone around you, for what, a truckload of insured corporate assets?
Honestly, sounds like the corporation's problem. I'm more afraid for human lives than some product in the back. In a case like that it'd be better to not have a driver who could be killed.
load more comments
(2 replies)
But, do they speak English?
Even in a hypothetical best-case scenario world, unless you have a driver on board any malfunction and you're delayed 2-8 hours because there wasn't a person in there to repair anything
load more comments
(5 replies)
Terrifying.
I wonder how much our car insurance will go up due to this.
I get that you're scared about multi ton vehicles running without a human. But self driving can and actually be safer than human drivers sometimes. Yes, self driving vehicles can cause devistating accidents in situations where a human driver would have handled the situation much better. Sometimes they can just bug out, which seems particularly dangerous, but we also need to consider who they're replacing: Humans. Humans get tired, Humans text & drive, Humans blink, Humans Yawn, Humans do drugs, Humans sometimes just don't pay attention. Because machines don't have any of these factors, they can statistically be much safer, of course assuming the technology is ripe enough and thoroughly tested before it's used.
load more comments
(2 replies)