this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
571 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

6891 readers
943 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Jokes on you, even when my fridge is filled to the brim it still doesn’t have any food for me, not even after the third time checking in an hour.

This is exactly how it feels camping on the last day trying to summon a meal from that can of tuna, and some well expired shitty white bread.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

It will after the 4th time you check it though

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Obligatory- refrigerators don't keep your food THAT cold and bacteria can start growing on it generally in just 4 hours if it isn't opened. So unless you know the exact time it died, or you know the internal temperature when you open it, then better to play it safe than risk getting sick

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Naw, people in this thread are the same "just trust science!" ones, except when it comes to things they have a bias about. Look, I get it: you've been using unsafe food practices since living on your own and you've never gotten sick. That doesn't mean you never will, or that anyone who eats your improperly-prepared food won't!

It's okay to learn and grow. My own mother, retired from the healthcare industry had to learn that a freezer is not a time capsule, you can't eat decades-old food with no consequences...

EDIT: The minutes-old downvote with no sources or facts proves my point tenfold. You have nothing, just your anecdotal feeelings.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so you're telling me that leftover pizza on the counter is no good the next morning? it's still just as tasty, maybe even improved by mingling and cohering of flavors. take my room temperature pizza from my cold dead hands!

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pizza, with cured meat such as pepperoni is probably fine. I wouldn't risk it with chicken though...

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 1 points 19 hours ago

wait.. I'm definitely not a food scientist but you are telling me pizza + toppings is fine but some (already) cooked leftover unrefrigerated chicken is not?

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

You can't eat decades-old food with no consequences

Except when you can. There have been cases where they have found canned foods from decades ago and when they lab-tested and taste-tested them they were still safe to eat (albeit a bit bland). The biggest danger with intact cans that are not inflated it that you might get lead poisoning if the can is older than ~1990

That's the whole point, you have to use your senses (common and biological). You can't assume that something is unsafe to eat just because it's beyond its best before date or has been stored at 5° instead of 4° for a few hours. At the same time you can't blindly trust that every food is fine just because it has been stored correctly.

Use your senses! I know doing that is not very famous these days, but you should try it sometimes.

So instead of "If in doubt throw it out" I'd suggest "If in doubt, throw it out, but if its still tasty, throw it in the pasty".

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

People have survived millions of years without refrigerators. Most products don't get bad in a few hours just because they're kept at 8° instead of 6°. Granted, there's some stuff you want to be careful with, like raw poultry and minced meat, but neither the pasteurized milk nor the cured sausage will go bad in just a few hours, even at room temperature. Even if they would, you'd usually see, smell and taste it.

If it was as bad as you say, millions of pupils would die each summer from food poisoning because of the sandwich they carry unrefrigerated with them the whole morning until the lunch break. The temperature in an average teenagers backpack is much higher than that in a refrigerator that has been off for a few hours.

[–] Tommelot@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

People haven't survived millions of years.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not sure if you believe that the earth is only a few thousand years old, or you're trying to say that all people that lived 150 years ago are dead by now, but humankind has been roaming this planet for more than two million years without refrigerators.

And quite successfully, if you consider that they conquered all continents without refrigerators, except the one where you really don't need a fridge.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am not the person you replied to but I believe they were referring to Homo sapiens being said to have emerged roughly 2-300k years ago, so 0.3 million, not "millions" (plural). Homo the genus might be a mil or two, but not the species, although you said "humankind" thus implying the species.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe it's just lost in translation. In my native language we'd call homo erectus etc. (primal) humans, so for me they are part of the humankind although they're not modern humans.

[–] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

You are correct. The word "homo" literally means human.

Homo sapiens are the only living humans, but Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthalus are all humans also.

However we usually use the term "archaic human" or even change human to "hominid" to prevent confusion between "modern humans".

You weren't wrong, but this is a kind of jargon which can confuse people.

[–] bpev@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I don't know what I expected when I started scrolling through comments, but I certainly didn't expect "how long humanity has survived depends on how you define 'people' "

[–] Tommelot@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We are not homo erectus though. So that's a rather silly comparison.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty homo erectus 😎

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

homo and erectus?

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I never said that you are homo erectus. That doesn't change the fact that homo erectus were humans. And even if you really stick to the believe that humankind only started with homo sapiens some 20000 years ago, it doesn't matter for the argument that people have survived a long time without being able to keep their food at a constant 4°C.

[–] WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FYI you accidentally dropped a zero, it's 200,000 years.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

It seems I'm not too good with numbers 😔 But it really doesn't matter if it's been 20k, 200k or 2M years, the point is, that it's been a long time.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

except the one where you really don’t need a fridge

Clear evidence that Big Refrigerator is actually holding back our true potential!

While what we currently define as humanity has only been around for about 300k years, this person might have gotten a definition that includes hominids in that, which would go back something liker 6 million years, and our direct "branch" something like 2 million.

[–] alcibiades@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

You’re so smart for pointing out their mistake! Boy what a dumbass that commenter was to write all that and mess up that detail, it just ruins the whole argument completely

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

sandwich they carry unrefrigerated with them the whole morning until the lunch break.

Wait, so you don't put an ice pack in your lunch box?? Or at least a frozen gogurt?

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago

I've never heard of children putting an ice pack in their lunchbox. No one did this when I was in school.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Usually no, and it's fine. If there's something particularly sensitive, then yes.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lol an ultra-processed sandwich (that's the bread, cheese, and meat) in a lunchbox for a few hours, hopefully with an ice pack, is leagues different from eating iffy chicken from a box that may or may not have been warmer for half the night.

No one's saying you'll definitely die from it, but you're risking salmonella. I doubt anyone who's suffered through it doesn't regret saving those few bucks... "When in doubt, throw it out."

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The sourdough bread, the butter, the cottage cheese or the meatloaf that my sandwiches consisted of weren't "ultra-processed". Neither was the boiled egg, the cut up fruits or vegetables or the homemade yoghurt. And of cause I didn't have an ice pack in my lunch box. I know nobody who had one.
I don't know what you have in your fridge, but I bet you 90% of the contents of 90% of the American fridges are more processed than what an average German school kid has in its lunchbox. So just throw out the 10% that aren't and feast on the remaining 90%.

[–] BearGun@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

bud did you just completely skip over the part of the comment that says you should be careful about some stuff, like raw poultry or minced meat?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 0 points 2 days ago

Actually, I did not! And I didn't say raw. Even cooked chicken should be used or consumed within 2-4 days: https://www.foodsafety.gov/food-safety-charts/cold-food-storage-charts

That's from when the US government was staffed with enough unbiased, science-following people! Also, it's only when stored in a functional, temperature-controlled space. And yes, of course it errs on the side of safety, so home chefs and restaurant-goers alike can be confident they won't kill someone. You're obviously free to stretch and even ignore those recommendations. But I don't envy the time you'll have if you get unlucky...