this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
334 points (98.5% liked)

memes

14463 readers
3841 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus 24 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Paid shills/trolls are here on Lemmy too

and don't think for a second that there aren't any government agents lurking around here, you'd be a moron to not realize that

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Any particular ones to be aware of?

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle 8 points 17 hours ago

Her name is Nicole but you can call her the Fediverse chick

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

For sure. But I’ve repeatedly raised the point of how we need defensive infrastructure here in hopes that someone has the means and know-how to implement it. Additionally, this meme is more so about Reddit’s complicity with these groups’ bots (both as a company and as the userbase) and only taking action when somebody openly admits to using malicious bots.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus 1 points 16 hours ago

For sure. But I’ve repeatedly raised the point of how we need defensive infrastructure here in hopes that someone has the means and know-how to implement it

you can't do that without KYC, with KYC enforced across Lemmy, atthat point, lemmy would be just as bad as Facebook and Instagram

That's the same kind of bullshit Nicky Haley wanted to do.

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 1 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

How do we stop that from happening here.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

PieFed has some tools already. Like if someone mostly contributes posts rather than comments, they get a label slapped next to their username to indicate a potential unregistered bot account.

Similarly an account less than two weeks old gets a different label, and someone who gives/receives mainly downvotes rather than upvotes a different label. You can also apply custom icons next to users of your choice (only you would see these).

They are very helpful! Seeing such a label may change how you interact with that "person" - e.g. you could block them, or answer differently or not at all. Knowledge is power.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Crowdsourced sentiment flagging, proof of work for posting, per community post history analysis and a paid staff of admins who won't abuse their power

TL;DR: We won't stop it happening here, in fact it's already happening

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

I think this would be more effective on the fediverse too, bots are trying to engage as wide an audience as possible, which gives us a metric to monitor activity across the fediverse.

For example, a user might post an article to the news community on their preferred instances whereas a bot will unbiasedly post it on all instances it deems fit to share with.

This isn't perfect but it's another metric to help weight and quantify bot activity for an automated defense system. RSS feeds and the like can specifically flag their accounts as automated to avoid misbans from the system too