this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
108 points (99.1% liked)

Space & Astronomy

1058 readers
55 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because it's not about saving money. It's about taking federal money and putting it into the private sector

After the federal government disbands their own internal systems the private sector can ramp up the prices just like they do with every other consumer.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

They didn't even start with low prices. SpaceX was gouging NASA from the start.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_launch_market_competition#2010-2020s:_Competition_and_pricing_pressure

Launch vehicle estimated payload cost per kg

Launch Vehicle Payload cost per kg

Vanguard $1,000,000

Space Shuttle $54,500

Electron $19,039

Ariane 5G $9,167

Long March 3B $4,412

Proton $4,320

Falcon 9 $2,720

Falcon Heavy $1,500

this is spacex's selling point edited for formating

[–] AngryMob@lemmy.one 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This article is only referencing cost per launch, which is just stupid. what about cost per kg to orbit? Or cost per kg to geostationary? Or cost per kg to beyond earth orbit? Cost per astronaut seat to ISS? Etc... these are the metrics that actually matter. The article also fails to mention inflation adjusted or not, which is important with the timescales they are using. Low effort ragebait article.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Cancel the contracts!

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If we ever get a Democrat administration, the very first thing they must do is cancel all SpaceX contracts immediately, no matter the consequence to NASA timelines.

I don't care if there's a Falcon on the launch pad. I don't care that it's a "contract". Stop all cash day 1. Let them sue.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd rather Elon get kicked out and spacex continue doing its work than close it down. they literally offer cheaper costs for launching (the stuff in the article is caused by revolving doors and such), and theyve done some incredible things for the space industry

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Elon getting kicked out doesn't change that for every $1 that goes to SpaceX, $0.42 goes to Musk which he will continue to use to overthrow Democracy.