this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17922 readers
32 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/197223

With everything going on with Twitter and Reddit I feel like I have a new appreciation for having my own local knowledge base on Logseq.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chaddy@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of my colleagues swear by logseq, but I personally haven't used it. If the upcoming sync feature would be available to self-host, I might consider switching to it, as it would combine multiple services that we are currently using.

[–] larmicon@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems to be file based, so wouldn't it be able to use other self-hosted sync-tools like the next cloud client (given you're hosting your own instance)?

[–] chaddy@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does this also work in a collaborative way, for example two people editing the same note? I would guess that file locking could be an issue.

[–] larmicon@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Depends ok the cloud solution you use, but it definitely could be an issue. Probably not because of locking, but because the files probably aren't locked with the clientson there could be issues while merging the changes.

[–] fritz@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

In obsidian I use the self hosted live sync so I can keep my vaults synchronized between my iOS, Linux and Windows devices. Is this possible in logseq yet? I would love to switch, obsidian is great but I try to use as much open source software as possible.