this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8488 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Powered by a BMW engine and normal fuel, the AirCar flew for 35 minutes between two Slovakian airports in 2021, using runways for take-off and landing.

It took just over two minutes to transform from a car into an aircraft.

Now vehicles made based on its design will be used within a "specific geographical region" of China.

Hebei Jianxin Flying Car Technology Company, headquartered in Cangzhou, has purchased exclusive rights to manufacture and use AirCar aircraft inside an undisclosed area.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] federalreverse@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What a terrible article. Trying to instill FOMO just because the Chinese are coming for it!!!!, despite the technology being destined to be exclusively used for rich people's toys.

"This brave new world of personal transport is acting as a great leveller," said aviation consultant Steve Wright.

Compared to cars: Energy consumption is much higher. Physical space use is higher. Material use is higher. Steering difficulty is higher. Insurance rates are going to be much higher. (...)

[โ€“] honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Trying to instill FOMO just because the Chinese are coming for it!!!

Take a look at the posts OP makes โ€“ they seem obsessed with posting negative articles about China.

[โ€“] 0x815@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Take a look at the posts OP makes โ€“ they seem obsessed with posting negative articles about China.

I have absolutely no interest of posting negative articles on China or any country, company or person. Some friends of mine are Chinese, and they largely support these posts, just fyi.

[โ€“] Sidyctism@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

I have chinese friends too, and they think your posts suck

[โ€“] honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're basically making the "I have black friends so I can't be racist" argument. Your post history is like 90% articles like these:

  • Chinese Communist Party-Backed Businessman in Fiji is a Top Australian Criminal Target
  • Calls for sanctions against China after Beijing accused of cyber espionage in US and UK
  • China's Private Property Developers Face Persistent Funding Constraints, Fitch Ratings Says
  • UK lawmakers claim 'harassment, impersonation, and attempted hacking' from China
  • Millions of U.S. citizens' online accounts have been caught up in a "sinister" Chinese hacking plot that targeted US officials, officials say
  • Threats, fear and surveillance: Chinese students in the UK say they are scared to return home and worry for their families in China after being followed and harassed by the regime in Beijing
  • Oxford University held training sessions attended by Chinese doctors accused of illegally harvesting organs

Like, this is not a normal amount of articles about China. This feels like an obsession. If I was posting a similar amount of pro-China articles, I'd rightfully be called a shill.

[โ€“] 0x815@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

@honey_im_meat_grinding

Thank you for your opinion. Please feel free to also comment on the articles' contents.

[โ€“] MrMakabar@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Flying cars are the stuff politicans love, because they do not have to change anything about car centric infrastructure at all, do not have to buitl public transport and only the rich can afford them. We call the helicopters today.

[โ€“] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Germany's Minister of Infrastructure just invested 150Million โ‚ฌ into a flying taxi company. Its just helicopters.

[โ€“] trollercoaster@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Career politicians tend to be rich themselves, they can't even imagine someone being unable to afford a flying car.

[โ€“] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

What I find really disturbing about this is the fact that so many people fall for this scam.

[โ€“] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They successfully unloaded their failed company on some greater fool. These things will never be viable for anything other than being rich people toys.

[โ€“] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

China is the best chance for it to succeed though. It would be far more expensive to gain regulatory approval across dozens of western countries than to just bribe a bunch of CCP regulators and gain domestic access to millions of millionaires in one of the largest countries on Earth.

[โ€“] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

But after a few of those fall from the sky, bribes won't help any more.

[โ€“] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're not even great toys though.

[โ€“] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

But you can use it to show off to your "friends", so what makes it worthwhile to them.

[โ€“] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A "flying car" is just a small, cheap plane/helicopter/quadcopter

[โ€“] taladar@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

You forgot the crucial aspect of the flying car concept. Privately owned flying cars are flown by unqualified idiots instead of qualified pilots and get basically no maintenance of safety inspections compared to planes and helicopters.

[โ€“] cynar@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We've had viable "flying cars" since the 70s. We call them helicopters.

Unfortunately for the futurists, there is a major floor with flying cars, and that's the failure mode. If a car breaks down, it stops. If 2 cars crash, they come to a stop, generally in the road. If a helicopter breaks down, it will have a very bad time, even in the best case. If 2 helicopters crash, then both will almost certainly plummet to their doom, as well as risking those below them.

Because of this, the regulations are a lot stricter on flying cars. This makes them a lot less practical or economically viable. Any other variant will run into the same limitations.

[โ€“] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If 2 helicopters crash, then both will almost certainly plummet to their doom, as well as risking those below them.

So, it's about time to discuss mandatory wearing of helmets for everybody outside of a house.

[โ€“] cynar@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Would be definitely at fault if killed by being hit from a flying car dropping out of the sky because he's wearing all black and no high-visibility jacket.

[โ€“] blackfire@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

At least they bought the tech this time instead of just copying it. Shame for us though

[โ€“] federalreverse@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

The Chinese have copied car-building techniques through the JVs Western companies established in China. However, the Chinese have also been heavily funding research into batteries and electric cars for decades. So, to a much larger degree the electric bits are actually their own inventions.