2, and only 2.

Those all suck, this is the perfect fork.

Handle of 5 + the fork of 3

None of these. 2 has the best tines, but the handle sucks. These look like forks you'd find in a diner. Rounded outer tines is a crime against humanity. Did you maybe want a spork instead? 😡

It's 2 and it ain't even close

2

2 and it's not close, 1 is the worst.

2

2

They all have problems. If i have to pick any one of them its going to be 2, but i won't be happy about it.

2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it's flimsy lightweight material then none of them.

None. They’re all stamped from thin sheet metal. Tines and handles are too thin and will bend.

2 clearly

Definitely 2. All other answers are just plain wrong.

You don't have to be neurodivergent to have an opinion about fork shapes. Also 2 is the best.

Number 2.

Long sensual tines, full round butt gives you something to hold on to.

The present is now, old fella

Head of 2, body of 5.

2 if I had to pick from that drawer, but the actual answer: Victorinox Swiss Classic / Swiss Modern cutlery. Absolutely love the large handles, sharp knives and large spoons. Very nice feel in hand and mouth.

https://www.victorinox.com/de-DE/Produkte/Haushalts--und-Berufsmesser/Besteck/Classic-Besteck-12-teilig/p/6.7233.12

Obviously #2, but with a slightly smaller handle tip and that's about it.

Apostrophe catastrophe.

Oh, there are forks: #2.

2 for a meal, 5 for snacks and desserts

2. Slim fork, wide handle.

2.The crazies here who don't think that's the best head by so much that the handle doesn't matter, they scare me. No amount of bad handle can make up for how much I hate the rest of them

2

Number 2, obviously.

Definitely 2.

2 is best. 5 is tolerable.

Worst 5 fork designs in this meme. Thanks for nothing

2 with 5s handle suppremacy

Long handle, long thin straight tines, large round pan so it fits nicely in your hand, 2 is basically the ideal fork

2

2

They are all OK. But I spent 7 years eating with a trident, so what do I know.

...get that f*ucking plural-~~comma~~ apostrophe out of my face...

^1^ ^head^ ^+^ ^5^ ^handle^

Six.

Look at this fork. LOOK AT IT. Now, calm down.

Handle of 5 with any other head 😭

How can people chose without weighing them?

3 or 2-with-5's-handle

Handle of 5, prongs of 3.

Clearly its the tines of 2 and the handle of 5. Anything else is madness.

My reasoning is quite simple. The tines on the No.2 fork are longer than the others. Long things are often associated with quality, status and refinement (Long fingers, long lashes, long legs etc.). The extra length suggest dexterity and precision.

Conversely the comparatively stubby tines of the No.1 fork would likely suit a toddler or an adult who isn't allowed near pointy things without supervision. Similarly the tines of the No.5 fork suggest that this utensil was born wanting to be a spoon but then was made into a fork at the last minute. This hypothesis is further supported by the rounded end of it's handle which would suit a spoon rather well.

Numbers 3 and 4 forks are usually, in my experience found in establishments where you help yourself to cutlery from big pots with grubby labels marked "SPOONS", "KNIVES" and "FORKS".

Now to the handles. Although the tines of the No.2 fork are pleasing, it then lets itself down with a handle that widens to the point of absurdity. Perhaps the thought was that it would help the extremely aged keep a firm grip while spooning tapioca past loose dentures.

So a cleaned up fork made from an amalgam of the refined tines of No. 2 fork and the pleasantly rounded handle of No. 5 are the only option for any adult with reasonable dexterity.

2

2 but its a bit big

2, but the base is a bit wide. Am I on the list now?

I dont like any of them :(

Trick question. These are all terrible, therefore I will eat with my fingers.

fork tierlist

S| 2
A| 3
B|
C| 4
D|
E| 1
F| 5

although, a non-metal handle would be better