this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Games

31749 readers
1395 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This should be illegal, companies should be forced to open-source games (or at least provide the code to people who bought it) if they decide to discontinue it, so people can preserve it on their own.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fkn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Edit2: Jesus people, please engage with the actual argument... not some strawman argument I didn't make.

I must be missing something here.

  1. Company buys land, designs and builds theme park
  2. Company operates theme park.
  3. Theme park isn't profitable.
  4. Company closes theme park
  5. ???
  6. Company must give away designs and schematics to theme park rides for free so people can build theme park themselves that might be in direct competition with new theme park company is trying to build???

Edit: I do think that abandonware should be opensourced at some point... but I don't understand this level of entitlement.

[–] average650@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm just missing some crucial info, but an amusement park seems like a fundamentally different thing than software.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the designs and schematics part that makes them equivalent.

[–] Gamey@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

You can't compare a one time ticket to an amusment park to a purchased product tho, that's just a bad analogy...

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Game preservation is dying because of DRM. You want games you can still play in 10 years, pirate that sht and donate to those keeping up the good art of game cracking. It's either that or buying remakes a decade later that are just thinly reskinned. I can live with sht like denuvo since newer games just remove it after a year and then I can buy it. Storefronts like uplay or egs that are dependent on a malignant profit only entity are at best mid-term rentals and at worst spyware you have to pay for the privilege to use.

[–] twoface_99@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

Furthermore, if you don't want to pirate: Buy your games on GoG. They are DRM free and you don't need the launcher to play (GoG Galaxy is amazing though btw)

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this a Facebook game…?

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

It's developed by Facebook, but it's not one of those in-browser games you might be thinking of. "Meta Quest" is their VR platform. So, while the quality might be similar, you do need to buy rather expensive gear to play this particular game...

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh god this reminds me of Japanese man who married Hatsune Miku in hologram form can no longer speak to his wife of four years.

"The doting husband has gained thousands of followers on Instagram by sharing insights into his life with Miku, but things took an unexpected turn during the pandemic when Gatebox announced it was discontinuing its service for Miku."

this is why I have trust issues with proprietary software

[–] Surreal@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that man harnesses the power of LLM like Chat GPT, he can continue talking with his wife

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Until ChatGPT is shut down. Have control over your waifus, people!