this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17508 readers
19 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The best part of the fediverse is that anyone can run their own server. The downside of this is that anyone can easily create hordes of fake accounts, as I will now demonstrate.

Fighting fake accounts is hard and most implementations do not currently have an effective way of filtering out fake accounts. I'm sure that the developers will step in if this becomes a bigger problem. Until then, remember that votes are just a number.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PetrichorBias@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This was a problem on reddit too. Anyone could create accounts - heck, I had 8 accounts:

one main, one alt, one "professional" (linked publicly on my website), and five for my bots (whose accounts were optimistically created, but were never properly run). I had all 8 accounts signed in on my third-party app and I could easily manipulate votes on the posts I posted.

I feel like this is what happened when you'd see posts with hundreds / thousands of upvotes but had only 20-ish comments.

There needs to be a better way to solve this, but I'm unsure if we truly can solve this. Botnets are a problem across all social media (my undergrad thesis many years ago was detecting botnets on Reddit using Graph Neural Networks).

Fwiw, I have only one Lemmy account.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I feel like this is a moot point. If you want it to be "one human, one vote" then you need to use some form of government login (like id.me, which I've never gotten to work). Otherwise people will make alts and inflate/deflate the "real" count. I'm less concerned about "accurate points" and more concerned about stability, participation, and making this platform as inclusive as possible.

[–] PetrichorBias@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In my opinion, the biggest (and quite possibly most dangerous) problem is someone artificially pumping up their ideas. To all the users who sort by active / hot, this would be quite problematic.

I'd love to actually see some social media research groups actually consider how to detect and potentially eliminate this issue on Lemmy, considering Lemmy is quite new and is malleable at this point (compared to other social media). For example, if they think metric X may be a good idea to include in all metadata to increase chances of detection, then it may be possible to include this in the source code of posts / comments / activities.

I know a few professors and researchers who do research on social media and associated technologies, I'll go talk to them when they come to their office on Monday.

[–] theolodger@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You mean to tell me that copying the exact same system that Reddit was using and couldn’t keep bots out of is still vuln to bots? Wild

Until we find a smarter way or at least a different way to rank/filter content, we’re going to be stuck in this same boat.

Who’s to say I don’t create a community of real people who are devoted to manipulating votes? What’s the difference?

The issue at hand is the post ranking system/karma itself. But we’re prolly gonna be focusing on infosec going forward given what just happened

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Get rid of votes. They suck.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, I want to downvote Nazis. Their opinions don't matter and should be suppressed.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Suppress nazis by bullying them, not by passively downvoting their hate speech and moving on.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

You can do both.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The lack of karma helps some. There's no point in trying to rack up the most points for your account(s), which is a good thing. Why waste time on the lamest internet game when you can engage in conversation with folks on lemmy instead.

[–] Ciryamo@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The lack of karma also makes it worse. Usually if I saw a discussion that felt kinda off I'd check the accounts age and karma. Made it easier to sniff out bots.

[–] bassdrop321@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Corporations could use it to push their ads to the top

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit admins manipulated vote counts all the time.

[–] daw_germany@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago
[–] AbyssalChord@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I‘m not a fan of up- and downvotes, also but not only for the aforementioned reasons. Classic forums ran fine without any of it.

[–] popemichael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You can buy 700 votes anonymously on reddit for really cheap

I don't see that it's a big deal, really. It's the same as it ever was.