UFOs

2689 readers

1 users here now

This community is for discussion surrounding UFOs and Extraterrestrials.

Rules

Be your own moderator
- Think before you post or comment, and use your common sense about what is acceptable. This is a community space and should ultimately be community-driven. Be the community you want to see here.
- If you are here because you want to make fun of or grandstand over all of the silly people who believe that UFO/UAPs may exist, you are not welcome. Just block the community and go about your day.
Be Civil
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults or personal attacks.
- No accusations that other users are shills/agents. If you have some kind of evidence of this, please report instead.
- No hate speech or abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing.
- No summarily dismissive comments (e.g. "Swamp gas.").
Posts must be related to UFO/UAPs
Avoid duplicate posts
Link posts should contain the linked content and a submission statement
- Submission statements should contain a summary of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, and optionally personal perspectives.
- For short-form content, such as tweets, include the entire text.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

DaughterOfMars@lemmy.world

I know, it's that OTHER place, but this is a better read than even that 4chan post. (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by OneDimensionPrinter@lemm.ee to c/ufos@lemmy.world

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In short, dude posts detailed biological information on what he calls EBOs (aliens!), details why he's convinced they are artificially created, and dives real deep into the genetics and how the body works. Very interesting read.

Tried to get an archive.org mirror, but it cuts the post off past the "read more" link. So, if someone else has a way to get that, lemme know!

The OPs account is "suspended". Not sure if that's exactly the same as deleted or not, so take that as you will.

Edit: Had GPT review it as someone with a PhD in biology, and it seemed to think that the claims could be possible, but obviously there isn't anything known that fits basically any of the claims made. So, more fuel for the fire I guess.

Anyway, throw up some ad and tracking blockers and then discuss. Balls to the wall crazy-time up in here.

Edit 2: Text was WAY too long to post here, so I did a pastebin of it. https://pastebin.com/ihAJxjPy

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] j4yt33@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

So I am very close to obtaining a PhD in molecular biology and I don't think there is anything wrong in there regarding the description of our known biology per se, but I find the level of information given a bit confusing. Who is the intended audience? It's nowhere near technical enough for a biology paper but then also too technical to just be directed at the general public. It reads more like something a nondescript scientist would say in a video game, like if you were to find notes in an abandoned lab after some unknown catastrophe kind of thing.

I would say it's a rather nicely written piece of sci-fi literature