this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17334 readers
3 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I assume "Other purposes" is govt kickbacks to mining and gas companies 😬

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gleph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I love that it helps you see how little of the welfare payments are going to the unemployed, since that’s the part that concerns people the most.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It must be so nice to see such a small bar for your defense spending.

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah because that shit is totally not needed. AU and EU need to step up their shit. Iran and China sure are.

[–] Quatity_Control@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except we don't want to be the USA of the Asia pacific region.

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You people live in a fantasy world where physical threats do not exist. The US is leading the way protecting Asia and Europe. The entire balkins would be under RU is it wasn't for that spending.

The spending it's needed and it's EU/Asia doesn't step up it's game they'll ultimately be a second tier power to the United States perpetually. Their call I guess 🤷‍♂️.

[–] KuroJ@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not sure why your being downvoted, but it’s true. Allied countries of the U.S. do not have to put much towards their military budget do to being able to rely on the U.S.

The U.S. has a strong military presence in the Indo-pacific region and if they didn’t, surely some adversaries would have already been having their way.

It’s unfortunate it comes to this but that’s just the facts.

[–] Version@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

People think big military = war, while in fact it‘s the opposite.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I strongly believe that this should be the standard everywhere. Unfortunately most governments won't tell you this, because a few of them are busy building golden temples for their authoritarian leaders, and blowing half of it on cocaine while pretending it's the immigrants' faults

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not only this, I think this should be selectable by taxpayers before they pay taxes so they can customize the amount that goes to each category. This would be the true democratic way of doing it. So, for example, based on your salary you need to pay 20k in taxes. You'd then select how much you want to go into Transportation, Healthcare, defense, education, etc.

This would quickly force the government agencies to work for their money.

[–] swnt@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

This wouldn't be truely democratic. It would rather be just like donations. Government spending works, because it's all out into the same basket. If it weren't, then rich taxpayers would move the movey to projects they want - and as would have very little old-age welfare, because they don't pay much taxes anymk6and every group in society would put the money into their projects.