this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Buy it for Life

4145 readers
104 users here now

A place to share practical, durable and quality made products that are made to last, with an emphasis on upcycled and sustainable products!

Guidelines:

Things that are well-made and durable (even if they won't last a lifetime) are A-Okay!

Unlike that other BIFL place, Home-made and DIY items are encouraged here, as long as some form of instruction is included in the body of the post.

Videos links are not allowed as post titles, but you may use them in a text post.

A limited amount of self-promotion is accepted, IF the item you are selling aligns with this criteria:

  1. The item must be made with sustainable or recycled materials.
  2. If electronic in some way, the item must be open-source.
  3. The item must be user-serviceable (if applicable).
  4. You cannot be a large corporation.
  5. The post must be clearly marked with a [Self Promotion] tag in your title.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Durandal@lemmy.today 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

“The average American buys more than one new piece of clothing per week. If that matches your shopping habits, in a span of five years you have purchased more than 320 pieces of clothing.”

Who the fuck is buying multiple pieces of clothing every week? I don’t know anyone that does that. I feel like buys-ridiculous-amounts-of-clothing George is an outlier and shouldn’t be counted.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This article is so entitled

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It really is the entitled version of the boots theory. I wear my clothes literally hundreds of times before they get worn out and this article is suggesting that 10 wears of "cheap" ($50) clothes and it's trash time. This article is way out if touch to the average non-fashion obsessed buyer imo.

[–] MuAraeOracle@real.lemmy.fan 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I may be a snob because the socks go in the bin, when the holes grow too big.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"too" big, sure, but not when they first appear

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

TIL that I’m probably entitled cause when I see a small hole, that socks goes to trash and the other one in the pair becomes orphaned.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey as long as you're not throwing out both if one gets a hole, I'm glad to have you on the team.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah exactly, the orphan must now wait until a matching orphan joins it. Then it can be worn just a bit longer!

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do individual socks count? If so, buying a 10 pack of socks and a 6 pack of undies gets you through half a year by this metric.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Man, I don't even do that every year. Maybe every 3-5 years. I do not buy clothes very often at all.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Judging by the amount of clothes at second hand stores in the US, its mostly middle class women

[–] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I have a shopaholic aunt who is said to wear things she buys once on avg. She could open her own 2nd hand shop (or if she moved her stock to Europe she could open ~6 2nd-hand shops). Many women in my family are inflicted with this disease to varying degrees. It’s a gender-specific disease that I think men are immune to.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Men are not immune to it, but it is less common

[–] CompN12@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

looks at $150 Warhammer model next time buddy, I'll grab a paint pot on my way out, and maybe a brush, hmm I need better sprue cutters...

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Here's the thing about "signaling to the industry with your money": They will take it and not give you shit.

Pay 30$ or $300 for a drill it's still made in China from plastic and planned obsolescence.

Underwear is no different.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

You've never bought a $30 drill, have you?

I use my Makita drill a significant amount. Right now I'm using it instead of a hand crank on my case trimmer (for reloading ammunition; I'm a moderate volume shooter). I've had it for nearly a decade. Yeah, I've replaced the batteries twice, and now have the higher capacity ones. But the drill is still holding up. The Festool Rotex disc sander I've got is easily the best sander that I've used.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Pay cheap and you get cheap. Pay more and sometimes you get fat better quality. Unfortunately, you can also get cheap with a larger mark-up.

[–] r_thndr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

I dunno, Makita and some Milwaukee tools are absolutely worth the money, especially if you're willing to buy into their battery ecosystem.

[–] toothpicks@slrpnk.net 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if I trust a lot of companies that make more expensive underwear to actually make something that lasts longer. I could put the research in to find something. But the markup between the cheapest things and the "quality" underwear always seems a bit much for me

[–] onion@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

I found Schiesser lasts pretty well

[–] braindamagebuddy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Soo.. What underwear are actually worth buying then? It doesn't seem like there are too many recommendations.

[–] onion@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

Schiesser is outlasting every other brand I've tried so far