this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
-59 points (11.7% liked)

Conservative

353 readers
66 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

What a load of corporate cock sucking drivel...

[–] Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Rising wages are a great thing when they are the natural result of workers becoming more productive

Oh yeah, I agree, a great thing, but then why

From 1979 to 2020, net productivity rose 61.8%, while the hourly pay of typical workers grew far slower—increasing only 17.5% over four decades (after adjusting for inflation https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/

Well I guess because

Starting in the late 1970s policymakers began dismantling all the policy bulwarks helping to ensure that typical workers’ wages grew with productivity. Excess unemployment was tolerated to keep any chance of inflation in check. Raises in the federal minimum wage became smaller and rarer. Labor law failed to keep pace with growing employer hostility toward unions. Tax rates on top incomes were lowered. And anti-worker deregulatory pushes—from the deregulation of the trucking and airline industries to the retreat of anti-trust policy to the dismantling of financial regulations and more—succeeded again and again. https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/

But, but, who could have pushed for these policies that deliberately devalued labor in America and reduced workers rights?

The Heritage Foundation, sometimes referred to simply as "Heritage,"[1][2] is an activist American conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1973, it took a leading role in the conservative movement in the 1980s during the presidency of Ronald Reagan, whose policies were taken from Heritage Foundation studies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation

So rising wages are a great thing when it's the natural result of more productivity, but the heritage foundation has spent the last 40 years making sure that wages don't naturally keep pace.

Now the heritage foundation is trying to convince you that workers are better off with lower wages, happier when they can't afford healthcare or pay rent, and more fulfilled when they work two jobs but are always on the brink of homelessness. Don't be fooled.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dipshit@hilariouschaos.com 12 points 1 month ago (11 children)

The author is basically saying you should be a slave until you get a good job. Can’t say I agree with this opinion piece.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (126 children)

the minimum wage can’t support a family. But minimum-wage jobs are important stepping-stones, allowing workers to gain experience and move up to higher-paying jobs.

The article is suggesting to just stop being poor by getting a higher wage job. What if the person can't? No family for you?

load more comments (126 replies)
[–] HunterOfGunners@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Banning bobafuttbucker because he posts when you won't is a coward's move. He's the only one who pretends this is a legitimate community.

[–] BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Timeline of events, read before it gets deleted:

8 days ago:

  • @wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee posted a CNN article and I commented acknowledging that it seems the source is now allowed here.

2 Days ago:

  • I posted this article from Fox about Elon, which got removed citing R2 (not sure what about Fox or Elon is viewed as anti-conservative or not pro-conservative, but there ya go).

  • I then posted this article from CNN, which is a running ticker of election 2024 stories with no specific bias, which also got removed citing R2 even though I added a comment (in line with the other rules of this community)

  • I made a meta post with no intention besides getting some attention about this perceived double-standard:

  • I DM’d Wintermute to gain some clarity about why these posts were perceived to have violated R2, with no response other than a community ban.

I’m posting this because I honestly feel the reasons given were complete bullshit. If Wintermute can use CNN as a source, why can’t I? If Fox/Elon stories are not pro-conservative, what is?

The only explanations I can think of are that Wintermute is deleting posts and banning users because he’s overreacting to the article title and getting triggered thinking it’s somehow anti-conservative, and/or he’s just using a BS excuse to kick me out of this community.

I have reached out directly to Wintermute and other mods on this community multiple times requesting explanations so I may make better contributions to this community going forward. As you can see, they’re falling mainly on deaf ears.

Maybe I’m a little trolly sometimes and for that I’m truly sorry, but I really try to adhere to rules for posting because I know how restrictive the rules are and think having these discussions can be valuable for everyone. But even when I follow mod examples they still block/ban me.

How is that anything besides a double-standard?

How does this behavior contribute positively to a community?

How is this behavior classified as anything to rational people besides power-tripping?

Do what you want if you’re the Mod, but if that’s what you have to do to spin the narrative in your head, maybe you’re just wrong and should find inner peace in accepting that. If you really wanted a healthy community here you would welcome this information as a basis for further discussion into our respective views. It’s now painfully clear you don’t.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›