this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Selfhosted

40347 readers
341 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
0
Raspberry Pi 4 replacement (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago by mar4e@lemm.ee to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have a Raspberry Pi 4 Model B with 8GB of RAM, and I'm looking for a bit more powerful solution that would have similar power consumption. I would like to host a Minecraft server, but chunks take too long to generate. Do you have any recommendations?

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look for second hand business PCs. They can be had extremely cheap and draw almost no power.

I have a Futro S920 and an HP ProDesk mini G300 (or something like that, never understood the naming). Both draw about 5-7W from the wall, which is roughly the same as my RPi3b.

The HP one has an i5 6500T and 16GB RAM, both upgradeable. There's also a real 2.5" slot including SATA connector on the board, an M.2 slot and an NGFF slot. Really cool device. The only slightly annoying thing is, that the fan can't be controlled (or at least Debian can't detect any PWM devices), and it's always slightly-on, which can be annoying. But for 100€? I think that's a good deal.

[–] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, thin clients are the way to go, but tgey will draw more than 5-7 Watt under load.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but is that really so much more (for a given amount of compute) than an RPi?

[–] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My Futro S740 with an J4105 CPU consumes up to 14 Watts according to this article. It is faster than a rpi 4b plus i bought it refurbished for 40€. I think a system with an I5 6500t will need even more power under load.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Well, yes, but it's also more powerful. If it's twice as powerful as a pi, it will only be half as long under load for a given amount of computation and thus require less power overall.

[–] ripe_banana@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To give a different opinion than all the thin-clients, old laptops can be a good choice too. I am a bit preferrential to really nice old thinkpads.

If you buy them used you can get insane prices (~$40) and also you get all the laptop conveniences of a keyboard, screen, battery (for power failure). Also I think the power/performance ratio is pretty much the same to the thin clients.

[–] Krtek@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Using the laptops battery isn't a good long term solution though as having it plugged in all the time will wear it down fast, not to mention that the battery is build for maximum energy density and not durability/safety. It just simply not working when it is finally needed is almost a pretty light issue when it can just also inflate and pose a huge fire risk next to all of your data. Laptops are great power efficient platforms though for servers

[–] ripe_banana@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First off, I think you're completely right in that laptop batteries are definitely a non-ideal solution. And, I'm really not an expert in this, so take my words with a grain of salt.

You could mitigate a bit of the dangers by doing some of the following (I only did the first):

  • Reducing the max charge level to 50% of the capacity.
  • Monitor your batteries health to alert for any discrepancies.
  • Switch out your batteries every couple of years (which is super easy without downtime on the aformentioned old thinkpads).

If you are an under $100 budget, there seems to be an argument that maybe you are willing to risk a little bit for that extra power reliability.

[–] Krtek@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

For that the laptop has to support a charge level on a hardware level though, just setting a limit will cause it to constantly switch between using the battery and charging the battery which would be much worse than keeping it at 100%. Most older and budget systems don't support that