this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

12556 readers
3662 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hstde@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Interpretation a) they are not real. They are part of the game/simulation and are not real, therefore they can't log out.

Interpretation b) they don't have the correct command. Sometimes computer are very nitpicky on what they understand and how you have to formulate a command. But one person seems to say exactly the same as the one who logged out, so either the computer is very nitpicky on the specific timing of words, or the command is user specific.

Interpretation c) they are not allowed to do that. Like in they don't have permission to execute the logout command, like you don't have permission to shutdown the computer infopoint in a mall. Or think of it like the matrix, where someone doesn't want to let you out.

Interpretation d) subconsciously they don't want to. Imagine the command is not what you say but what you really want, so they can't log out, because subconsciously they do not want to.

Personally I tend to interpretation a) because there is this theory that in an endless or nearly universe, it is basically given, that some species will invent a computer that is capable of simulating an universe, which in turn will have a simulation going, because the same rules apply. Now if you follow this train of thought, you will arrive at the conclusion that for every universe, if there are multiple, there is a basically endless number is simulated ones, which makes the chances that you are not part of a simulation practically zero. Yeah, so that's that.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

there is this theory that in an endless or nearly universe, it is basically given, that some species will invent a computer that is capable of simulating an universe, which in turn will have a simulation going, because the same rules apply

My main gripe with simulation theory is that this claim just seems... false.

First off, it's not possible to create a simulation of equal complexity to the host universe, so each iteration would necessarily have to be smaller, and I would contend significantly so.

Even the wildest theoretical computers can't even simulate Earth, much less the universe.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chances are whatever dimension is hosting our Universe server, is probably 4th or 5th dimensional.

Sorta how we can make a detailed 2D simulation like Dwarf Fortress. Our 3D universe might as well be somebody's Super Nintendo.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chances are that we're not in a simulation, but you're right that for our universe to be simulated, the host universe would need fundamentally different physics.

Even then, I feel like you're underestimating the scale of the universe. Dwarf Fortress is laughably simple compared to a real universe. It's a toy. You'd need something more than a couple extra dimensions for our universe to be at all comparable to that.

[–] hstde@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

To be completely honest, dwarf fortress is way more complex then tic-tac-toe.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)