this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

45489 readers
788 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
0
reactor bad.jpg (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Clarke311@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SternburgExport@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

They both suck. Going renewable is the only way.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fossil fuel based solutions are significantly worse for climate change than nuclear. Saying that the other renewables are better is matter of discussion, but renewables without nuclear are not going to make the cut. Using both renewables and nuclear is best to cut emissions.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

nuclear is not viable. It is not stabilizing but endangering the grid as nuclear plants are vulnerable to heat waves and dry spells. The kind of westher events to increase drastically with climate change. In Europe many nuclear reactors had to be powered down in the last summers because they couldnt get cooled anymore. Also they put further stress on limited water ressources by literally evaporating the water away.

You can life without electricity but you cant life without water.

load more comments (9 replies)