this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8488 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
0
Germany’s Days as an Industrial Superpower Are Coming to an End (www.bloomberg.com)
submitted 8 months ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The first one is intrinsic incentives, the second one I should have called subsidies. You are correct it's messy like this.

[–] florian@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

While I do see a difference between those two "incentives", they are not that different to me. Both are about the general economic conditions which a company uses to determine where to invest. Also in both cases the conditions are influenced by politics, and shaped by financial policies.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

It is distinctly different though. it is especially dangerous to rely on subsidies as a means for attracting businesses. There was an example of Nokia who received about 100 Million to build a cellphone factory in the 2000s. After the subsidies ran out ten years later, they moved the plant to Romania. This is the risk of subsidised business. You pay the difference for the poor conditions, don't receive more in return and then the business goes away anyways.