this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

265 readers
1 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
7
Update (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 months ago by kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/libertyhub@lemmy.blahaj.zone
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have chosen to abandon all the major changes I had planned. This post will be used for feedback and suggestions. Since I'm the only mod I need community feedback.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I thought the motivation for the changes was obvious. The interpretation of the rules by the former moderator was so narrow, the community ended up (banning people for having left-wing views) and enforcing liberalism. There was no room for discussion, because if you had a discussion, the worst was assumed and you were banned. It went against the core ethos of the community. It seems that Kittenzrulz only wanted to bring the enforcement of the rules more in line with their spirit. There was never any wish to allow liberal points of view, only points of view from people further to the left like soulists and other schools of anarchism.

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the community ended up banning people for [...] enforcing liberalism.

That's because this explicitly goes against rules 2 and 5

No defending oppressive systems or organizations

No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You've misread that sentence. The community ended up banning people. The people had left wing views. The community ended up enforcing liberalism. I understand how grammatically that sentence was ambiguous, but surely you could have extended the benefit of the doubt to My intentions and realised I was against liberalism.

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

People were banned for bringing liberalism where it's explicitly stated to not be allowed.

The sentence was confusing because it's the complete opposite of what actually happened.

Unless soulism preaches a different definition of liberalism, because midtraveler also has a strange definition of liberalism.